English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

17 answers

I think marriage as we now know it might morph and transform, but the idea of attaching yourself to a companion, and having it be acknowledged in one way or another by the society one lives in, will persist for a very long time.

2007-01-16 06:15:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I do think marriage will lose some of it's appeal but not disappear from society. I mean the divorce rates are so high compared to years ago. There are all kinds of reasons but it seems like nowadays not many people want marriage. They just want to "live life and party" and that's not what it's all about. I think marriage will continue to lose it's appeal until people start to reevaluate what they really want in life.

2007-01-16 06:59:34 · answer #2 · answered by angelicasongs 5 · 0 0

I do not think that marriage will ever loose its appeal, but I can see and understand marriages have an end dates, more like a business contract, that will be negated .at one time marriages were supposed to be for life, but that was when the average life expectancy was about 48 for a man. then there was enough time to see his children grown and the next generation on the way but now the life expectancy has just about doubled and very few couples make a 60 wedding anniversary

2007-01-16 06:11:14 · answer #3 · answered by rkilburn410 6 · 0 0

Marriage has lasted for a long damn time, and only in the last 50 years has it been a topic of concern. Coincidently, the feminist revolution has lasted for about 50 years.

Men and women are not the same, they have equal opportunity to persue what they want, but they have different needs which creates different roles.

However, societies push towards the individual and less towards the partnership is the cause for the decay marriage. Worrying about your needs and less about your partner and families needs is the problem.

2007-01-16 06:46:07 · answer #4 · answered by tightlies 3 · 0 0

Renata, this is one of the best questions I've seen here. My answer is a qualified yes. Right now, marriage is as easy to get out of as it is to get into. We have multiple views on marriage, so-called family values, religious mandates, spiritual pathways, mystical unions and simple contractual arrangements. People refer to the experience by many terms...but the bottom line is that marriage is a simple agreement by two people to live their lives together "for as long as they both shall be willing". So why not simply draw up a contract that says this? And, if the parties want to end the contractual relationship, they can write into the contract, in advance, how they want to terminate the contract. I think this is the direction we're all headed.

2007-01-16 06:10:24 · answer #5 · answered by judgebill 7 · 0 0

As long as there is a wedding-related industry, it will always be marketed as a good idea. Otherwise who is going to buy $3000 dresses that only get worn one day? How about the the $1000 to $5000 diamond rings? And let's not forget expensive cakes....

2000 years ago, it was promises of dowries, gifts of goats, and land deals.

Nope, there's no profit in making weddings unpopular. Therefore marriage will always be in style.

2007-01-16 06:09:26 · answer #6 · answered by eric_seeger 2 · 1 0

No.

There still are many people worldwide who desire a decent relationship with one person and, who will take that step in spite of the polls and self-appointed marriage advisers, who could not have one solid one themselves.

The world has become so 'modern' in its approach to literally everything, that a large section has lost its way, its ability to think for itself, to examine itself and form relationships without referring to somebody's book which is spiced up to catch the ignorant's eye. I have read some of these books and wonder how it is that some of these authors cannot hold down one half-way decent relationship, yet they assume the authority to advise the rest of us how to deal with our men and women. Please!

The Relevance is just plain odd and far too unrealistic; that's all I can say. I fail to make the connection.

2007-01-16 06:21:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i think of it is taken into consideration one of those issues which you will ensure how substantial it is to you. Me, i'm 20 years previous, i like to drink, occasion, pass clubbing, and drunkenly kiss my guy pals (i'm attractive as all get out). I smoke some legal and not-so-legal ingredients. And yet, i'm a virgin. and of path people assume i'm not. No i'm not waiting for marriage merely the final guy or woman, and no that guy or woman does not could be my destiny husband merely somebody I care deeply for, love, and know and for that guy or woman to care deeply for me as properly, love me, and know me. i'm an enormously choosy female because it is. merely ensure once you lose your virginity it is actual and the guy isn't feeding you bullsh!t, too a lot of my pals first circumstances ended with guy dropping interest and a ruin up. believe your instinct. And any guy who ever says "in case you adore me you will do it." properly in return you assert "in case you adore me, you will wait." =] people choose virginity as not being a huge deal, even with the undeniable fact that it is. a huge deal.

2016-12-16 06:07:14 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

no because there will always be those who believe in some kind of god who outlines that we are here for marriage and procreation. until religion loses its appeal and disappears, i woudn't expect marriage to.. (no, i am not saying that only religious people find marriage appealing, but you get my point)

2007-01-16 06:07:21 · answer #9 · answered by Bethany 2 · 0 0

Having said that marriage is a way of relieving sexual pressures, Paul now says something else very significant. He says sex in marriage is designed of God to teach us something about ourselves, and to fulfill a missing need in our partners. You see this in Verses 3-5:

The husband should give to his wife her conjugal rights and likewise the wife to her husband. For the wife does not rule over her own body, but the husband does; likewise the husband does not rule over his own body, but the wife does. Do not refuse one another [or to put it more bluntly, as the Greek actually does and as we read in the King James Version, "Defraud ye not one the other"] except perhaps by agreement for a season, that you may devote yourselves to prayer; but then come together again, lest Satan tempt you through lack of self-control. (1 Corinthians 7:3-5 RSV)

The major thrust of that paragraph is telling us that sex in marriage is designed for the fulfillment of each partner.

The Bible says that through Christ we should bring discipline and control to our thought-life. Our thoughts should not control us, but we should rule over our thoughts. "Cast down arguments and every high thing that exalts itself against the knowledge of God, bringing every thought into captivity to the obedience of Christ" (2 Cor. 10:5). Sexual fantasizing is a symptom of lust and is not pleasing to God. It stimulates and promotes sexual anxiety, which can lead to impure behavior and fornication. Get your mind out of the gutter and discipline your thoughts on good, and holy things.
"But I say to you that whoever looks at a woman to lust for her has already committed adultery with her in his heart" (Matt. 5:28). (Read Mark 7:21-23, Eph. 4:8.)

Marriage is to prevent fornication, lust, and also to control sexual disease.

2007-01-16 06:09:29 · answer #10 · answered by bbluckylove 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers