English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-01-16 05:51:15 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Football (American)

14 answers

Adrian Peterson

Reggie Bush was a great college player but Petterson will be a better pro player, U can't really depend on reggie he is a space player, he likes to bounce out and dance around but thats not going to work all the time. Thats why he his alot better at recieving than rushing. But AP looks more like the NFL players that can pound it up the gut for every play

2007-01-16 06:58:31 · answer #1 · answered by ImaGman 5 · 0 1

Hands Down Reggie Bush...Quicker And Better Agility...Might Be The Same In Overall Speed But How Can You Compare And NFL Rookie Who's Proven Himself A Few Times, To A College RB Who Couldnt Run All Over The Boise St Defense...And AP Hurt Himself Divin Into The Endzone...Well He Might Have Been Hit But Still....Reggie Got Hit This Week And Shrugged It Off....AP Gettin Hit Like That...Another Broken Collarbone

2007-01-16 05:57:34 · answer #2 · answered by Jae T 2 · 1 1

Reggie Bush would put Adrian Peterson to shame in every category.

2007-01-16 06:45:37 · answer #3 · answered by hamthugger 4 · 1 0

There's no clear cut answer as we haven't seen Peterson in an NFL system. We can however, say, that Reggie Bush is phenominal and has the potential to be the next L.T. If you're looking for the "if I played tomorrow who would I want?", the answer is Bush. But if you're looking for who will have the better career, we'll just have to wait and see.

2007-01-16 06:09:29 · answer #4 · answered by gerrykrauss1978 2 · 0 0

Reggie Bush is a threat to score from anywhere on the field in the Pro game and the same can't be said about AP. AP is also injury prone. He had one health year at OU and it was his freshman year. I think he will be good in the NFL but the running back position is not all about running the ball. the best backs in the league have proven they have to pass protect and pass receive.

2007-01-16 07:33:21 · answer #5 · answered by eddies_impala95 2 · 0 0

Bush he is more explosive and more versatile. Bush has crazy speed while Peterson is a more powerful runner. The NFL has many powerful runners but not many runners with the speed and moves of Bush. Who knows if Peterson will even be a success in the NFL.

2007-01-16 05:58:47 · answer #6 · answered by Bruce Tzu 5 · 0 0

Reggie bush will make marshal fualk like like a amateur

thats how good he is

2007-01-16 07:20:07 · answer #7 · answered by K to the T 2 · 0 0

Reggie bush that fool is a beast.Not even the diet pepsi machine could stop him

2007-01-16 07:58:37 · answer #8 · answered by javi 2 · 0 0

they have different styles of running.

reggie bush is a open field runner. the only way he can have success is runnig to the outside.

adrain peterson is like a speedy powerback. he can run inbetween the tackles and get hard hards.

i think adrain peterson because he is a better OVERALL runner.

2007-01-16 06:25:44 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Bush is a better all-round back. he can run the ball as well as catch it out of the backfield.

Peterson is good, but Bush is better.

2007-01-16 06:09:35 · answer #10 · answered by mesquitemachine 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers