English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-01-16 05:07:34 · 5 answers · asked by jset1989 2 in Social Science Economics

5 answers

1. All foreigners are dangerous, treacherous and likely to be terrorists until proven otherwise. Especially if they look a bit like Arabs or Muslims. (Even if they're Hindus they're still Muslims to us.)
2. The government of Israel is always right.
3. The government of Sandy, oops Saudi, Arabia is always right except about Israel. I mean, we need their oil so let's keep them in power and on our side at all costs.
4. If foreigners cause trouble, start a war against them.
5. When we have won the war and conquered their country, put in a government of people we like, make their people vote for it and call it "democracy". For hell's sake, though, don't let the majority of their people actually get what they want or we'll have another terrorist government on our hands like we think we have in Iran.

2007-01-17 19:52:50 · answer #1 · answered by MBK 7 · 0 0

That's accurately what our international coverage is designed to do, for the reason that the humans who come to a decision our international coverage (the participants of the Council on Foreign Relations) undergo no allegience to the United States or its humans. The "mismanagement" of the Iraq War is only a duvet tale for some thing so much worse. Bush did not architect this factor, it used to be the paintings of so much smarter humans. So a long way, they have gotten precisely what they desired. McCain: CFR Obama: CFR Have amusing every person!!!

2016-09-07 22:01:21 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Lazy neo-capitalists know that they are inferior people who can't make a profit except by a one-sided re-distribution of the wealth that was created by their employees. Because Western workers have too much pride to become economic cannonfodder for these corporate parasites, the Little Pigs Who Go to Market established an extra-nationalist cartel comprising the privately wealthy and the politically powerful in every country that would collaborate in their utopian piggishness of creating jobs for slavish Third World coolies.

Do you wonder why so many foreigners own stores in America? This is one of the items in every trade deal--for the anti-Americans who own our country to provide opportunities in what is left of America for favorites of their powerful foreign collaborators. Tricked by Liberal agents of the extra-nationalists to blame this on a faked multiculturalism, the American people have no one to blame but themselves for not suspecting that the pseudo-patriotic right-wing is behind all these insults to American sovereignty.

So neo-conservative, neo-capitalist foreign policy is a fraud. It has nothing to do with national security--the neo-caps don't recognize themselves as belonging to any specific nation--but can only be explained economically. For example, the Iraqi War has been designed for:
1. Government contracts for Halliburton and its clones.
2. Restricting Iraqi oil production to create artificial shortages and huge, unreported profits for the American oil companies and their OPEC collaborators.
3. Use the Iraqis for cheap labor in neo-capitalist sweatshops.

Because the extra-nationalists have inferior, ignorant minds, this utopia of theirs didn't work out as planned. Now they're stuck and their whole international House Built of Plastic will collapse. Can't you hear it creaking?

2007-01-16 06:30:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Indifferent of international consensus or approval.

2007-01-16 05:12:39 · answer #4 · answered by john k 4 · 1 0

Drop bombs now, ask questions later.

2007-01-16 05:10:41 · answer #5 · answered by biggimpin 3 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers