... always have to think they are the top of the world? Why do they think they're right about everything? Opinions are opinions. Just because some site like Infowars says 9/11 was an inside job doesn't mean it's true. We're not living in a Hollywood movie, people. This is reality, OUTSIDE of the internet websites.
2007-01-16 04:57:24 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I agree. I had many friends who were close to the towers on 9/11 and have been there myself. The people responsible are being held responsible. The rest of these conspiracy theories do nothing but take away from the truth and make it harder for us to stop future attacks. Get real people. JMO
2007-01-16 05:03:16 · answer #1 · answered by MM Fan 2 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Well they actually do think they are the top of the world or some kind of extra smart or genius. Take for example the myth(conspiracy) that the Bush Administration told regarding Iraq possessing WMDs and now they are playing the same trick(conspiracy) on Iran. People who talk about 9/11 being an inside job do have a point because there is no proof what so ever that Alqaeda was behind 9/11.
2007-01-16 05:17:34 · answer #2 · answered by The Big Man 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Even hinting towards the notion that something is wrong with doubting "official" explanations is not a genuine interest of patriotic Americans questions your loyalty towards our peoples right to the absolute truth. The facts surrounding the timeline and curious actions of the Bush Regime is the defining momentum behind the assumption that 9/11 was an inside job that could have been easily avoided. There is no doubt, that the tragedy could have been avoided. There is no doubt that it allowed the Bush Regime to legally hornswaggle the American people into believing that a bunch of unecessary actions needed to be taken culminating in Iraq. The opportunity to lead the world into a new age was squandered into a loss of civil liberties and foreign policy turmoil all in the name of Greed.
Why not ask why?
2007-01-16 05:13:19 · answer #3 · answered by scottyurb 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I agree with Pfo. Whenever there is info missing from the official explanation or there are plausible facts that are ignored it leads you to wonder. My question concerning 911 & the JFK assassanation are the same. If the governmen, as they claim, had no prior knowlege of the acts before hand. How did they conclude so rapidly who the responsible parties were. Oswald & AlQuida????
Just food for thought. Gov conspiracy....probably not, but at least consider that they probably knew more then they are telling before hand.
2007-01-16 05:12:01 · answer #4 · answered by U can't b serious 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I feels good to "know" something that nobody else knows because they are not smart enough to observe the overt patterns found in most conspiracy theories. The most common conspiracy theories are founded on "public" information, not secret documents and photos, etc. It takes a special intellect or divinely guided spirit to observe these conspiracies. That makes the theorist better than everyone else, or gives them purpose and meaning in their lives in the guise of saving the world from disaster. Very powerful stuff. Often funny, too!
2007-01-16 05:08:11 · answer #5 · answered by voodooprankster 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
That is true, but chances are with all of the conspiracy theories out there that some portion of them are true, or at least in the right direction. I'm not talking about 911, I'm talking about all of them. They exist because the explanation on the record is unclear, and hints at missing information. Conspiracy theorists fill this void with all sorts of drivel, but sometimes they have good points.
Believing in these things is like believing in God, you can't prove it and it fills the void of the unknowable. It's about as reliable as faith to, and it's not fact.
2007-01-16 05:01:02 · answer #6 · answered by Pfo 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Absolutely right, just because they think they're right, doesn't mean its true. Doesn't mean its false either though. At the end of the day, examine both cases for yourself and make up your own mind. UNTIL you've done that though, you're in no position to comment either way.
2007-01-16 05:09:34 · answer #7 · answered by dead_elves 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Well, you know how these liberals like to start controversies. People like Mel Gibson, Michael Moore, Cindy Sheehan, etc like to create fantasies in their minds, then pass them on to the general public to start a controversy. This is because they despise our president, hate what he stands for (which is doing what is in the best interest for the safety and security of the country) and because they are against the war in Iraq. It's all a part of their 'Smear Bush' campaign - nothing more. They lack a sense of reality - that's all.
2007-01-16 05:02:58 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
Not all of them rely on internet info. Was 9/11 an inside job? I think it could have been. Nothing from the internet tells me this. Seeing what happened, how they fell, the stocks traded the day before, how it was confirmed that United flight 93 had landed a hour prior and that it was not a plane that hit the Pentagon.
Possible.
2007-01-16 05:01:40 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 6⤋
I have yet to see any who thought they were completely right. If they come across as arrogant, it could be the result of being bashed so much and not believed.
2007-01-16 05:07:07 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋