Seriously, aren't the Chargers known for show-boating and running their mouths all the time? Shawn Merriman is one of the biggest offenders. The only one who has a righ to be crabby about it is LT because he always was a class act...except now because of his incessant whining I even question that.
2007-01-16 04:34:13 · 10 answers · asked by patrickh 3 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
Boo Friggin' Hoo. The Pats had to deal with this when the Raiders cried that they were ripped off. And I tolerated it to a point because I too thought it was a bad call back in the day.
But The Chargers just didn't deliver. There was no controversial calls to lean on. LT should be angry that he only had 7 touches in the second half. That Merriman and all his chemically induced play only allotted him 1 sack and 2 tackles all day. They let the Pats hang around and it cost them. be mad at yourselves.
2007-01-16 05:16:50 · answer #1 · answered by Jimmy 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
True, true. Chargers ran their mouth all week. Steroid Merriman said that he was going to bust Brady in the mouth and does dances after textbook tackles. Tomlinson needs to look at his own team and talk about being a class act and forget about the Pats. The Chargers disrespected the Patriots all week and the Pats let it loose at the end of the game.
Were the Pats a bit over the top? Maybe. But until Merriman acts like every tackle isn't his first tackle, until NONE of the Chargers trash talk to the media, trash talk on the field or commit any penalties, LT needs to shut his face. You lost. Period. Get over it.
2007-01-16 06:57:15 · answer #2 · answered by dougzinboston 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What goes around comes around. Balco Merriman jumped around like an idiot after routine plays, not even interceptions or sacks. He was effectively neutralized during the game, so he has no legitimate beef about the Patriots celebrating after the game. They wisely kept their emotions in check, even when the Chargers were taking cheap shots. The result was the Patriots got a couple of key penalty calls against the Chargers that would have been offsetting penalties if the Patriots had retaliated. That is the difference between a Bellichik coached team and brand X.
2007-01-16 04:44:47 · answer #3 · answered by mattapan26 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
As I stated previously, i haven't got self assurance i have considered everyone "whining" about both of those, in reality the in reality ingredient I actually have considered is human beings posting questions like this and declaring stuff from the previous. besides the undeniable fact that i visit assert that the tuck rule became a bogus call at that aspect and time and the Raiders must have gained that interest for my section. No it does no longer have prevented the dynasty from coming to be besides the undeniable fact that it would want to have stepped ahead the Raiders to the subsequent round.
2016-11-24 21:19:09 · answer #4 · answered by corina 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
man u are a hater san diego Chargers number 1 in everything
2007-01-16 04:38:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
no u obviously dont watch the chargers cuz they dont showboat and he isnt whinning ur just making worse by asking this question
2007-01-16 05:05:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no that is 3 points
2007-01-16 04:38:36 · answer #7 · answered by eckeeney2000 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Pats suck! Tom Brady and Belchadick are fags
2007-01-16 04:40:23 · answer #8 · answered by epjet19 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
u r so right.... maybe they should concentrate on penalties and fumbles and bad coaching...oh and parade planning....wait - they can scrap that idea!
2007-01-16 06:22:00 · answer #9 · answered by Jim G 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i hate new england!!!
2007-01-16 04:38:10 · answer #10 · answered by jeff m 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋