Yes he was pushing racism towards whites. He started race riots, he was pushing hate towards whites. He is actually not the person he is so called to be.
2007-01-16 04:42:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by john haase 1
·
2⤊
1⤋
Many posters here are proclaiming that Martin Luther King wanted everybody to have equal rights. OK, I'm fine with that, so why do blacks cry the loudest when Affimative Action and racial quotas are taken away? Seems they live by a double-standard inconsistent with King's teachings. Saying it's a program to make up for the sins of slavery is a dog that won't hunt. Every race and nation of people have suffered under slavery at sometime in history.
2007-01-16 08:10:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by cheetah 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
He did not believe that the black race was supreme over all like a white supremacist does, so how could he be labeled as a black supremacist? That make no sense.
2007-01-16 04:42:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by Bee Biscuits 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
"Let us hope that the dark clouds of racial prejudice will soon pass away and the deep fog of misunderstanding will be lifted from our fear-drenched communities, and in some not too distant tomorrow the radiant stars of love and brotherhood will shine over our great nation with all their scintillating beauty."
Above is an excerpt of a letter written by Dr. King from a Birmingham jail (which, by the way, he was unlawfully placed after participating in a non-violent peace march.) Now, if these are the words of a true black supremist, I think that Webster's may want to try rethinking its definition of what racial supremacy really is. (In other words, he was a man of peace, not a black supremacist.)
2007-01-16 04:59:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by lacha_1980 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Do you know what supremacist means? It means that you think all other races are inferior to yours. There is absolutely no evidence in any of his speeches, or letters or conversations with others (many of whom are still alive) that Dr. King ever believed anything like that. He certainly never said it in public. Also, the FBI admitted years ago that they listened in on his private conversations. Those tapes have been made public (through the Freedom of Information Act) and he never said anything racist in private either. So NO.
2007-01-16 04:45:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by roscoedeadbeat 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
He never thought of himself or his race as sumpreme. Hence the difference. He asked for equality in all mankind: race, gender, religion, socio-economic was not an issue. The issue was that the reality of the constuition was a farce. Can you get a life and stop the drama and accept the fact that people of color did not "white man's power" it was just a matter of equality.
2007-01-16 04:43:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by LOLO W 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Supremacist at what? If the log is real big you pull the handle twice.
2007-01-16 11:56:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by juan v 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
the solutions I particularly have study it is in simple terms undeniable sickening, it is so unhappy to think of that the Jewish owned communist information media has have been given such diverse human beings thoughts washed, M,.L,ok, became a dyed interior the wool communist from the be conscious circulate, and the F.B.I. had all the info of him and diverse greater attending communist education centers ni Russia, and China, and a few of those comments have been made public, although the communist information media did no longer make the main this, as they might, had it been a white corporation, did you already know the Jews began the N.A.A.C,P, interior the Eighteen Eighties and function been the pinnacle of it because its inception, I in simple terms ask your self how lots money they made in this little caper? confident M,L,ok, did carry forth and faux he needed non violence, yet at the back of closed doors issues have been diverse, many crime has been devoted by using the non violent N,A,A,C,P, yet via the masters of deception they won't be at as quickly as blamed and coated by using our Jewish owned information media,for occasion the F,B,I, got here across over 40 stolen automobiles belonging to the N.A.A.C.P, interior the 60s that they had bought from a broking who had went out of corporation and skipped out???? i think of that became particularly slick no person became prosecuted, how ever I guess you nor i ought to flee with that. many different crimes ,murders and so on have been devoted that led back to King yet, with Jewish help he became in no way indicted ,
2016-12-12 12:43:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
black + supremacist don't mix those two words people will think you are a fool.
2007-01-17 08:08:42
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
He never preached black supremacy but equal rights. But I suppose a non white man asking for dignity is RACIST!!!!
2007-01-16 04:39:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋