2007-01-16 04:05:08 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Yes, and I'd send Rumsfeld to Germany to stand trial on war crimes.
Bush and Cheney would be next.
Why should the American taxpayer have to pay to keep those two in cigars and women for the rest of their natural lives?
2007-01-16 04:09:50 · answer #1 · answered by Brotherhood 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Not no, but hell NO!
I don't care what the nutcases in here say. There is NOTHING to impeach him on. If it were the Democrats would have been pushing to impeach BEFORE they took back control of Congress. AND Now that they have control again they would already be setting up process.
Democrats can't impeach without doing so much damage to their own party they would be back out of power after the next election.
2007-01-16 13:21:15 · answer #2 · answered by namsaev 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No. Impeachment is a last resort and requires certain criteria of impeachable offenses to be met. He may be incompetent and exercise poor judgement but thus far he hasn't committed any impeahcable offenses that have been disclosed to the public.
2007-01-16 12:13:46 · answer #3 · answered by Rose G 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
As a liberal thinker I believe in the process of law..I believe he should be impeached but procedure must be applied !
2007-01-16 12:12:40 · answer #4 · answered by dadacoolone 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I am not a member of the United States House of Representatives, so the point is moot.
Thanks.
2007-01-16 12:08:35 · answer #5 · answered by theearlybirdy 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Nope. No grounds to and it wouldn't accomplish anything.
2007-01-16 13:12:21 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hell no! Then Cheney would be president!
2007-01-16 12:13:51 · answer #7 · answered by runner08 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
No he hasn't done anything wrong.
2007-01-17 10:26:15 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no
2007-01-16 12:13:05 · answer #9 · answered by ababy 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
NO!!!
2007-01-16 12:12:28 · answer #10 · answered by BooBoo 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋