2007-01-16 04:01:02 · 7 answers · asked by Brotherhood 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Well....
hmmm.
Have to remember that al-queda is technically considered neo-con on the world political spectrum so no, not all neocons are interested because some of them already know where he is.
2007-01-16 04:09:31 · answer #1 · answered by Mikey C 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hmmm.. and here I am thinking that OBL is more useful to Western governments if he is never found. What's better than a bombing bogeyman to scare all the little citizens into bed at night?
--
Thanks for two thumbs down. I suppose you also think that keeping Saddam in power (after Gulf War 1) had nothing to do with the agreement to keep US bases in Saudi (as opposed to remove them if Saddam was no longer a threat)?
2007-01-16 12:20:28 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Well in march of 2003 when we invaded iraq, america had 3,000 soldiers in afghanistan looking for bin laden and fighting the taliban.
Today we have 21,000 soldiers in afghanistan looking for bin laden and fighting the taliban.
So , you decide, are we looking for him more now, or more before the iraq invasion.
2007-01-16 12:12:15 · answer #3 · answered by jeeper_peeper321 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Even if they were, they're still not as disintrested in finding Bin Laden as Billybob Clinton was. All Billybob had in mind was taking care of little willie.
2007-01-16 12:14:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
It appears so since what is left are still in lockstep with Bush. I think they feel Bush is a investment for them regardless of his poor leadership.
2007-01-16 12:18:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Probably so. And also just as disinterested in finding him as Clinton was.
2007-01-16 13:06:31 · answer #6 · answered by Molly B 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
since he's dead, IMO, yep.
2007-01-16 12:43:05 · answer #7 · answered by political junkie 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋