English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

When i saw the news today about the failed bombing in London it told us the chemicals that were in the bomb, don't you think this is stupid, as some other idiot might go and try it now just for fun !!!!

2007-01-16 03:41:42 · 8 answers · asked by ? 6 in News & Events Media & Journalism

8 answers

yes they did publish this but this isnt any thing that is not already published on the internet they did also specify that it has to be the perfect balance for this to work as you can obviousy see the gang of so called terrorists coldnt even get it right

2007-01-17 06:04:12 · answer #1 · answered by sexybum272 2 · 0 0

The probability of blowing yourself up to smithereens in a blind attempt to make a bomb is rather high. What that means is that if you are trying to make a bomb without a known recipe you will end up dead faster than if you are doing actual research. So if they are playing with fire, they will burn themselves. Good. One terrorist less to deal with.

Additionally, someone who buys large quantities of a chemical known to become a bomb constituent will automatically draw attention from the FBI or MI5 or Mossad, or whomever. Then the investigation, arrest, trial, imprisonment and deportation. Again, Good! One less criminal on the loose.

Stupid and idiot would be the words to be used for the imbecile who goes and buys the bomb materials just to have fun. That just means the kid (invariably it's a dumb kid) will hurt himself (also typically it's a boy), through no fault but his own.

2007-01-16 03:51:03 · answer #2 · answered by anon 5 · 0 0

Only the ingredients were described and just as the suspects found, the mix must be spot on for a successful ignition. Even the temperature can impede detonation. Unfortunately, details are widely available on the Internet so for once, no need to blame the press.

2007-01-16 05:45:53 · answer #3 · answered by James Mack 6 · 0 0

Sorry to disappoint you, but the details published were not of the explosive mixture itself, just the other items that were packed into the bombs to cause more pain and suffering than a simple explosion alone would. For example, there was acid to cause skin burns and various metallic items such as screws washers and nails that would cause shrapnel injuries and even chapati flour, which would carry dirt and germs into any wounds caused by the other items.

2007-01-16 04:02:17 · answer #4 · answered by Peter M 2 · 0 0

According to the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. "

It's a freedom of the press issue.

2007-01-16 04:32:35 · answer #5 · answered by MyThought 6 · 0 0

Bomb making literature is everywhere. anyone who can't figure out how to make a bomb without a newspaper report is to stupid to be a terrorist.

2007-01-16 03:51:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

because if you do a search now im sure you'll find it anyway

2007-01-16 04:23:20 · answer #7 · answered by liam0_m 5 · 0 0

good question... did u try to ask them...?

2007-01-16 03:48:13 · answer #8 · answered by cool and simple 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers