English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Why hasn't President Bush been blamed for it yet? We all know he has to power to cause storms to hit.

Washington is a blue state, so it's all so confusing to me!

2007-01-16 03:18:13 · 3 answers · asked by The Cult of Personality 5 in Politics & Government Politics

3 answers

Thought you got the message, dont you remember when he stood silently in his debate with Kerry standing silently for 90 seconds blinking real fast he sent the Neo-Cons that message.
Hold on another 90 seconds, I will blink really fast for you so you can get another message

2007-01-16 03:23:26 · answer #1 · answered by AD 3 · 0 0

wow, you people keep showing how ignorant you are.. people are pissed at Bush's lack of action during the Katrina disaster.. not that the disaster happened.. his actions are what are blamed.. only a kook would miss associate the two. if another natural disaster occurs that Bush should help with and he fails to act.. then again he will have fault.

2007-01-16 11:24:02 · answer #2 · answered by pip 7 · 0 1

You should change your name to asker got no clue. Get a life.

2007-01-16 11:24:12 · answer #3 · answered by ihaterepublicans 3 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers