Just a few weeks ago the NSA was doubting that al-Maliki had what it takes to be sucessfull. Now we are sending in more US troops to prop up the goverment.
2007-01-16 01:33:05 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Only if your a Neocon spending America's money for a militia supported by Bush and his cronies. I don't think the Iraqis want to be Neocons either, so go figure!!!
2007-01-16 01:40:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 1⤋
I have no FAITH in the al-Maliki government. The whole thing will fall when we leave Iraq, whether it's 6 months or 6 years from now.
2007-01-16 10:29:41 · answer #2 · answered by Do You See What Happens Larry? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If the object was to make an Iran friendly government, that supports radical clerics like Al Sadr, then I have all the faith in the world.
If it wasn't, and i suspect it wasn't the plan, Bush just did Iran's job for them, and at no cost to the Iranian government.
Al-Maliki is an Al Sadr loyalist!
2007-01-16 09:36:41 · answer #3 · answered by qncyguy21 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
This question should addressed to the Iraqis and to Mr Bush.Both Iraqi people and Bush has no faith in Al Maliki government .How can any body has any faith with it!
2007-01-16 09:42:35 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No. I have no confidence in his ability to lead "All of his people." Nor do I have any confidence in his administration. It's a lot like our own government and the current administration. Iran is a serious problem in Iraq, yet our pentagon's surplus sales has on more than one occassion illegally sold weapons err-- "spare parts" to arms dealers who inturn sold them to Iran. Go figure.
The many and various spin doctors in Washington have made it a major point to tell you about the possible, plausable threat of WMD. Yet no one thought to explain that this government (Reagan) sold them those capabilities or that Carter gutted the CIA leaving this country blind and heavily reliant upon the good graces of foreign governments to feed us intel. And, while I know the motives behind Iran's shadowy presence in Iraq and their desire for nuclear capabilities, those same spin doctors have yet to enlighten the masses. No, no confidence at all.
2007-01-16 09:48:35 · answer #5 · answered by Doc 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No...no faith at all. He has shown himself to be a friend to the insurgents we are fighting against. Only he calls them the Iraqi militia. He has demanded that American Soldiers not enter certain areas where we could have destroyed the terrorists/insurgents. He is protecting them. He is a puppet to Al Sadr.
2007-01-16 09:34:55 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
I do not have to believe in the al-Maliki government. I am not an Iraqi. All that his government needs is for Iraqis to believe in it.
The U.S. should butt out and let Iraqis sort out their future.
2007-01-16 09:39:25 · answer #7 · answered by fangtaiyang 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The Middle East will never be peaceful without ending the Israeli occupation. This is the conclusion of the UN, EU, Backer-Hamilton report, and President Carter new book.
2007-01-16 13:15:14 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
The Shah of Iran keeps coming to my mind.
2007-01-16 09:39:25 · answer #9 · answered by Overt Operative 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I have no faith in a "puppet" government. I dont have a heckuva lot of faith in my own Government right now.
2007-01-16 09:42:09 · answer #10 · answered by pompanopete0 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
No, he has had a few years to get it together and hasn't done anything. I think Bush put the puppet regime in place to pacify the U.S..
2007-01-16 09:37:07 · answer #11 · answered by Big Bear 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋