2007-01-16 01:09:36 · 5 answers · asked by happyinac5 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
who says they don win anythin ??? of course they win....they win our hearts.....!!! they get lots n lots of fame......they get our respect for workin day n nite....!! they get somethin more than a lousy DIRECTOR gets....!!
2007-01-16 01:14:20 · answer #1 · answered by funbun 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I feel you. I guess it's not that the actors themselves weren't any good. They would have had to have been good for the director to win his or her award. I suppose it's just that other actors and actresses in other movies gave better performances. Plus, a good director could probably get away with a complete average cast and win a directing award, but none of them were outstanding enough to garner their own individual award.
2007-01-16 09:21:44 · answer #2 · answered by luttibelle 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Or, in the case of "Return of the King" Peter jackson did a great job in directing a bunch of losers (not a single nomination. They just must have been steaming piles of manure!)
I get more confused with a split decision for director and film.
"You are a great director, here's your award, but your film was crap!"
2007-01-16 09:23:18 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Cause of the art of directing, not the actors performance.
2007-01-16 09:21:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
This one is easy: other actors from other movies gave more compelling performances.
2007-01-16 09:17:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋