in Vietnam II?
2007-01-16 00:47:50 · 10 answers · asked by protocols 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
How is it unethical to not deploy with your unit doesn't deploy. Who looks the idiot here now?
2007-01-16 00:54:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 2⤋
This has nothing to do with the question, because that doesn't deserve an answer.
Before you sprout off ridiculous questions you should do some reading. Yes, books still exist. While you are totally off base with our President, privilege always had just that. In history you will find that persons of privilege at one time PAID others to do their military duty for them. So you see, this is not a new revelation, and won't be discontinued anytime soon. Think back to Vietnam (you mentioned it) how many democrats, republicans, etc. managed to get their someone deferred. Sorry, but you can't beat this one.
2007-01-16 09:44:38 · answer #2 · answered by Nancy W 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Senator John Glenn said:
There were 39 combat related killings in Iraq in January,In the fair city of Detroit there were 35 murders in the Month of January. That's just one American city, about as deadly as the entire war torn country of Iraq. When you claim that our President shouldn't have started this war consider this:
FDR led us into World War II. Germany never attacked us, Japan did.From 1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost...an average of 18,334 per year. JFK started the Vienam conflict in 1962.Vietnam never attacked us. Johnson turned Vietnam into a quagmire. From 1965-1975, 58,000 lives were lost...an average of 5,800 per year. Clinton went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent. Bosnia never attacked us. Clinton was offered Osama bin Ladens head on a silver platter THREE times by Sudan and did NOTHING! bin Laden has attacked us on multiple occasions. In the years since terrorists attacked us, President Bush has liberated two Countries, crushed the Taliban, crippled Al Qaida, put nuclear inspectors in Libya, Iran, and North Korea without firing a shot, and captured a terrorist who slaughtered 300,000 of his own people. Since there seems to be alot of "whining" about the length of this war, consider this: It took less time to take Iraq than it did Janet Reno to take the Branch Davidian compound. That was a 51 day operation. We've been looking for chemical evidence in Iraq for less time than it took Hillary Clintion to find The Rose Law Firm billing records. It took less time for the 3rd Infantry Division and the Marines to destroy the Medina Republican Guard than it took Ted Kennedy to call the police after his little car "accident". It took less time to take Iraq than it took to count the votes in Florida. Our Commander-In-Chief is doing a hard job. Military morale is high. The biased media hopes we are too ignorant to realize the facts.
2007-01-16 10:51:35 · answer #3 · answered by jaypea40 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Shouldn't talk about Clinton like that. He was a DRAFT-DODGER and spent his time in Europe
badmouthing the US while US Military was in
Vietnam. There is NO VIETNAM II!!!!!
2007-01-16 09:43:24 · answer #4 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
You must be thinking about Clinton who spent several years Dodging the Draft.
And he was a coward his 8 years as president.
Bush served.
Did you forget that for the last 2 years many Democrats were screaming to send more troops?
Demcrats don't care, they just want us to lose.
You sound like one of them.
2007-01-16 08:57:06 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Whether it's ethical or not, you don't have to worry about the Idiot-in-Chief sending any more soldiers to die as he finished up his last term of Office in 2000. I agree with you that he did use privilege to avoid service and spent his time in Europe smoking marijuana and hanging out with women of loose morals, like the one he married
2007-01-16 08:55:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 6⤋
Yes I agree sitting over there in Europe bashing the US and smoking marijuana thank god we don't have that draft dodging womanizing immoral liar leading our troops You were asking about Clinton weren't you?
2007-01-16 09:32:10 · answer #7 · answered by Ynot! 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Volunteering for service is a privileged route out of the aforementioned service?
I don't get it
2007-01-16 08:52:46 · answer #8 · answered by Addicted To Adverbs 1 · 3⤊ 2⤋
When do you think that ethics ever bothered him, he has taken away our rights and trashed the constitution all in the name of terror, why do you think it would bother him to send even more solders to their deaths. This into a war to embellish his own personal gain, he should be impeached.
2007-01-16 09:02:39 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 6⤋
No its not but ethics is one thing Bush never cared about
2007-01-16 08:51:44 · answer #10 · answered by paulisfree2004 6 · 1⤊ 8⤋