Rutherford said that electrons are moving and loss energy and get close to nucleus and falls in it and get collapse.But it is said to be wrong.What is wrong with it?Electromagnetic theory states that 'a moving charged particles radiate energy' . We also know that distance decrease with the decrease of energy.According to both of the laws,Rutherford's commment is right.Please tell me why,Ford's model is drawbacked?
IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND WHAT I AM TELLING?EPLY THAT I DIDN'T UNDERSTAND.THEN I WILL DESCRIBE MORE.OK.
2007-01-16 00:15:54 · 7 answers · asked by ukp15 2 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Chemistry
the reason is simple; where do the electrons go? they aren't destroyed, (which is impossible) but they come very close to the nucleus, but dont 'fall in' they orbit there until enough energy is present to move up to a higher energy field, and the process starts over.
2007-01-16 00:24:14 · answer #1 · answered by Trid 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The particle view of the electron would cause the electron orbit to collapse into the nucleus. However by treating the electron as a wave function instead that is able to take quantum states and the electron stays in orbit
2007-01-16 08:20:39 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
According to classical physics an ACCELERATED moving charged particle MUST radiate energy. Electrons are accelerated so they must radiate energy, their orbit must be spiral and they must fall to nucleus. BUT THEY DON'T.
Nils Bohr fixed this problem ! ! !.
2007-01-16 08:23:47 · answer #3 · answered by Dimos F 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nile bohr(or bore) added that electrons move in only a set of selected orbits from where they do not radiate energy..
this is accepted till date...
2007-01-16 08:22:48 · answer #4 · answered by Sandeep K 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
ford said that electrons shold fall in nucleus. if it does then elec combines wit proton forming a neutron which results in reduction of one elec and gives a +ve charge to atom ie ion.this implies atoms can never exit in neutal stable state but they do exit. this was his thoerys drawback
2007-01-16 11:10:09 · answer #5 · answered by veena s 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You can't describe an atom and its electrons using classical mechanics. You need to go to quantum mechanics. See below.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_mechanics
2007-01-16 08:20:45 · answer #6 · answered by Gene 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There are newer technology, and scientists have different theories. And mostly scientists have to agree on one thing. Your idea might be plausible. But us little people without the technology might not know.
2007-01-16 08:24:52 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋