Do you think the workplace discriminates against women primarily because they go off and get pregnant?

Answer 1

Women do not "go off and get pregnant". Yes, that thought is one of the reasons that women are discriminated against. However, by not making the workplace a "family friendly" environment, you are excluding a very competant class of people (men and women) that are extremely productive in their career as well as being fantastic parents.

Answer 2

Somewhat. And perhaps they're still in the mind that men are supposed to be the bread winners and women are supposed to be in the home. Also they feel that since a woman doesn't have upper body strength as a man does then maybe they don't want to be liable if the woman hurts herself on the job lifting something so that's why women are discriminated against.

Answer 3

Women aren't discriminated against in the workplace, at least in the US.
Discriminating against a woman in employment is illegal would be prosecuted by state and/or federal prosecution.

Employers need employees in attendance, not attending personal business. This is one of the reasons feminists point to and claim sexual discrimination. It is only that the employer is looking for employees without attendace problems. There is no difference to the employer if the employee is off giving birth or off because they just didn't want to work today; the end result is they aren't at work.
Truth is, many women disrupt their "careers" with pregnancies (many don't; many only take a few DAYS to a couple of weeks off) but they have no right to complain when those who remained on the job are promoted or receive salary increases during their absence.
It is not sexual discrimination, it is good business practice and it applies to the pregnant woman every bit as much as it does to the individual that is off work for any reason.

Answer 4

That's the largest identifiable reason, but otherwise it's well-founded and/or mislead views about how women behave in the workplace. Gossiping & moodiness are probably the most common complaint about women in the workplace, but at higher levels, the gender differences are much less.

Answer 5

"Are employers precise to discriminate hostile to females likely to develop into Pregnant?" I probable would not use the note 'descriminate' in spite of each and everything, the middle function of the corporate is to make money and to stay worthwhile. i might want to argue that employers truthfully have the right to settle on the finest & powerful human being for the job. not something incorrect with doing that. "ought to being pregnant be treated like numerous different wellbeing mission that could want to bring about lengthy time period absence for paintings?" definite. "might want to the mission be addressed with information from providing "no being pregnant" contracts?" Many employers are already doing this yet I evaluate this to be somewhat inhuman and unfair for women who desparately favor earnings to help the relatives. That suggested, females ought to attempt their ideal not develop into pregnant at the same time as they understand they don't look in a healthful & solid economic position. In end i might want to assert there is not any 'precise' or 'incorrect' 2 this mission. businesses favor to stay worthwhile and so it would want to be completely logical for employers to guage the factors that could want to impact productiveness. desire it truly is smart.

Answer 6

Think of it from the employer's point of view ... do you want an employee who is going to be with you (for the most part) consistently and constantly through the year .... or do you want an employee who, every few years takes a leave of absence for 6-9 months everytime they get pregnant?

Plus not to mention workplace daycare expenses and extra costs associated with children/families and the corporate world.

It makes more economic sense to hire men.

Answer 7

Yes, my sister in law was passed up on promotions many times because each time they were ready to give such a promotion, she turned up pregnant again. Finally some female manager of hers told her "you need to decide if you wanna be a mom or be part of management". Quite frankly she had no right to tell her this, but on the other hand pregnant women sometimes cant handle the full responsibilities of their jobs, if it means hectic hours.

Answer 8

I've experienced discrimination like you wouldn't believe during my career in industrial chemistry. I don't have kids so it couldn't be because of that. I don't menstruate because I take a hormone to control endometriosis and therefore don't have cycles. That can't be it.

Any other theories?

How about:

1. Women are considered weaker by nature by our society and therefore less able to handle the rigours of work. Again, not accurate. I could do the work of three men and often did.

2. Women are disliked in field considered to be "male" - like industrial chemistry (not pharma or medical!) - and therefore are believed to be displacing men. If that's the arguement, then perhaps I can just simply do a better job than a man. I happen to excel at my chosen field.

3. The workplace is filled with old, neanderthal thinking men who like THEIR status quo. They don't want change. I'm afraid change is the only constant in life. Get used to it. I had to.

4. Men fear what they don't understand. There are so many horror theories about women - many of them mentioned by others (PMS, b!tchiness, cramps, moodiness, etc.) which are just as true of men. You cannot tell me that men don't have bad days. I've worked with the crankiest, b!tchiest, rage-a-holics you would ever meet and they were men.

So I would easily and comfortably discount your claim that "the workplace" discriminates against women because they "go off and get pregnant". It's short-sighted and immature.

Answer 9

i think it happens less so now than 'back in the day' - employers have started to realise that woman are just as good or better than men in the work place and that to hold on to their good employees they have to deal with the fact that woman are going to take time off to have babies

Answer 10

No its pure jealousy, if once a month I could say PMS and get a couple of days off or act like a ***** and blame it on my monthlies I would.