why would tou want to see that!!
2007-01-14 20:27:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by stu 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
The official explanation is that the impact of the aircraft severely damaged the fireproofing on the floors where the impacts occurred. As the jet fuel burned at some 1200 deg. centigrade, it severely weakened the steel structure at that point. You notice the collapse began at the floor where the planes hit, not below or above. Once the floors went and the 20-30 floors above them went it was too much weight for the floor below, and then the floor below that and so on and so on. It started a chain reaction. What is more mysterious to me is the statement by the owner of building 7 that they had to 'pull' it, a construction term for demolition. Also strange is how quickly the steel from the buildings was scrapped and sold to the Chinese. There were also video tapes of the plane hitting the pentagon which was immediately confiscated and recordings from the traffic controllers on that day were shredded and spread to multiple garbage cans. I'm not saying there is a covert plan being protected, but there certainly are a lot of unanswered questions. Personally, I think they are covering up massive incompetence.
2016-03-28 22:24:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
What - the American top-draw personnel 'conspired' the damage and murder (2,973 people, bedamned)? Surreal!
What's the next question; did America have anything to do with Germany's none-too-friendly entry into Poland in September 1939...or closer to your wee heart, Karen, did Sheffield police decide to ignore a section of Hillsborough (id est; switching off CCTV where the Liverpool supporters were) on orders from the Chief Constable in the day of the tragedy?
2007-01-14 20:53:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Fcuk me some people take life so seriously. Of course it's good to see, I find it absolutely amazing, I still do, I love watching it .... not to say I think it's right, or that it was a good thing, just that it's the most amazing thing ever....
2007-01-14 21:29:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
yeh stu has got the right q for u i mean that was such a dramatic disaster and it was so devastating to so many american families thats pretty low... i mean what sick person would put that on the internet... i mean someone even put steve irwins death of the internet... it was really sad and you shouldnt be looking around for that anway
2007-01-14 20:33:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
visit CNN as they were the first to cover the amateur photos of the Twin Towers - I also saw them falling first on CNN
www.cnn.com
2007-01-14 20:33:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by quilm 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Why on earth would you want to see that?!
2007-01-14 20:36:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
How morbid.
2007-01-14 20:38:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by robert m 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
how could that be a "GOOD" web site???????
2007-01-14 20:32:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by forever 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
are u kidding?
2007-01-14 20:30:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by teh c 5
·
1⤊
1⤋