English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

where

x, y, z all > 0
and
xyz =1

I've done similar problems in the past. I know that I can shift everthing to one side and put in a factored form:

0 <= (x-1/2)^2+(y-1/2)^2+(z-1/2)^2 -3/4

but where to go from here, or even what to do.

Looking at the conditions, since x,y, and z > 0 then we can express
x=1/(yz)

and similar with y, z...

Any ideas?

2007-01-14 17:42:50 · 5 answers · asked by modulo_function 7 in Science & Mathematics Mathematics

To JJ:

Huh? What about x=1, y=2, z=1/2

then xyz=1

2007-01-14 17:53:46 · update #1

I tried to go back and tone down what I had said, JJ, but found out that I could only add more details, not edit details. Oh well. What you did is the kind of thing that one does when taking a quick look and quick jab at solving.

Thanks for you effort. Perhaps you can return tomorrow and see what's been posted. You'll probably lose sleep thinking about it!

2007-01-14 17:57:55 · update #2

Thanks again, JJ.

You don't seem to want to allow any numbers between 0 and 1.

x<1 -> x > x^2
x>1 -> x < x^2

2007-01-14 18:36:40 · update #3

Gianlino;
Thanks for the effort. However,
x,y,z are restricted to > 0 not just >1. Your contribution is somewhat complicated and it's late, so I'll give it more attention after some snoozing.

2007-01-14 20:27:56 · update #4

5 answers

ok, so start with x, if x is an element of positive real numbers, x is less than x^2. this is a fact. do the same for y and z, then add the equations. im too lazy to go through all the steps. its pretty simple, i think. lol, sry for the other answer, i was thinking the characteristics of a zero product...

2007-01-14 17:50:46 · answer #1 · answered by J J 3 · 0 3

If x, y , and z=1, non problem. So you may assume z>1. For a given value of (x+y) the minimum value of (x^2 + y^2) will be (x+y)^2 / 2. So it is enough to show that x+y+z < (x+y)^2/2 + z^2.
So now you just want to show u+z u is the sum of two numbers x and y such that xy=1/z , that is u^2-4/z >=0. The minimum of u^2/2 -u + z^2 - z as a function of u, is attained for u=1 and is z^2-z-1/2. So if z> 2 there is no problem. If z< 2 remember that u^2>4/z. So the minimum has to be considered only on the interval u>= 2/sqrt{z} where it is
2/z - 2/sqrt{z} + z^2 -z. Letting w=sqrt {z} you get to study the sign of 2 -2w + w^6 - w^4 for 1

2007-01-14 19:47:20 · answer #2 · answered by gianlino 7 · 0 0

i dont know the answer, but the above answer is incorrect. If xyz=1 it doesnt mean x=1, y=1, z=1. What if x=1, y=2, and z=.5?

x, y, z > 0 gives you an easy out. Also your factored form is wrong. This might be better:

0<= x(x-1)+y(y-1)+z(z-1)

2007-01-14 17:59:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

method to prove question like these is here: You surly know that (x-y)^2 => 0 so: x^2 + y^2 - 2xy => 0 ==> x^2 + y^2 => 2xy for 3xyz <= x^3 + y^3 + z^3 and your question do like this.

2016-05-24 04:07:55 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

You're on the right track. You need to show that

x² + y² + z² - x - y - z > 0

You started out with the right idea--factoring.
x² + y² + z² - x - y - z
= (x - ½)² + (y - ½)² + (z - ½)² - ¾
We added in ¾ in the factoring so we need to take it out again.

Hmm...I need to think about the rest.

2007-01-14 18:29:52 · answer #5 · answered by Northstar 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers