English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

18 answers

Only if you offer yourself as a target.

2007-01-14 17:17:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

Your question assumes they will be "outlawed". Given that there have been quite a number of previous Democrat Presidents and it hasn't happened, this seems very, very unlikely.

If they were to be outlawed (again, this will probably not happen) a large number of Americans probably would run out to buy them, since for the most part Americans are not stupid.

Also, if a democrat is elected President - probably more people would have enough money to buy guns, ha ha!

2007-01-14 17:24:44 · answer #2 · answered by Rob O'C 2 · 2 0

We have more guns than most if not all other Countries. Besides, we also have more gun deaths than any other western democracy. Why is that? Why do we have so many murders with guns? Why do we have so many gun accidents? Why do so many people commit suicide with guns in America?
If we elect a Democratic President in 2008, the crime rate will start going back down. War always creates a rising crime rate because war spreads the lesson that solving problems with guns is appropriate. Of course, solving problems with guns is a crime rate in the making.
The simplistic ideas of an advertisement campaign are not helpful if you are looking for actual solutions to problems like guns in the wrong hands for the wrong reasons.
Does fear motivate you more than information or thought processing?
Is the big bad wolf going to get you at night? Does you monster under the bed have a gun?

2007-01-14 17:30:32 · answer #3 · answered by zclifton2 6 · 1 0

i'm not a dem as i have no party loyalty. most would consider me a lib,even though i don't fit the stereotypes. why would i rush to buy firearms? i own quite a few and i have never seen a time dems or repubs have restricted that right. it is another BS political lie that anyone seeks to take our guns. i can buy any gun,but can only posess full automatics legally with a FFL class 3 license. do most citizens need full auto?
most libs i knoew own guns,in fact of the people i know cons own no guns or less guns. it is not a political thing,it is a personal choice people make.

2007-01-14 17:33:37 · answer #4 · answered by kissmy 4 · 1 0

It doesn't matter who is president. The right to bear arms is guaranteed in the second amendment of the Constitution. Democrats just don't want people with criminal records to rush out and buy them.

2007-01-14 17:22:06 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Jeez, you're making it sound like there's a photo of him shaking hands with Sadaam Hussein (hint, hint). contained in the first position, he has no connection with any corrupt company called acorn. contained in the 2d position any association he may have had with the honest and in charge ACORN: which not purely dutifully flagged all registration anomalies at the same time as sending them in (as REQUIRED with information from federal regulation), yet also precise this second pronounced a fraudulent pimp supposedly enthusiastic about baby prostitution ( after putting them up for a sting with the clerk's cousin, the sheriff of Tijuana) -- changed into casual at ideal, not something which will be properly defined as a "tie". fortuitously the american voter isn't so stupid as to fall for a man made hit-piece subsidized with information from the discredited Breitbart , F*x, and M.O.P. (depressing previous party), without looking deeper previous the lies.

2016-12-02 07:09:06 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Why wait for the election? ha ha they have Congress already.
How ridiculous, why bother buying firearms, they won't protect you from nukes? Of smart bombs, or any of their mortar fire. Tanks would be good though the nuclear ones though they are much safer than a Hummer, ha ha. I still can't figure, a man I will not mention his name but he has an arsonal it is legal he is a collector. But he has no army only him. how can he fire all of those things at once? Why have more than a double barrelled shot gun and then get tanks, stay in there and launch till you get to be fried spam in the can. ha ha

2007-01-14 17:22:22 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

As a gun-toting extreme liberal who is very active in the Democratic party, there is no major figure that even considers guns to be on the agenda.

Another lie by Republicans that gets the ignorant up in arms.

2007-01-14 18:26:17 · answer #8 · answered by bettysdad 5 · 1 0

Wow. You Connies are always in fear... scared of your own shadow, yet you claim to be the ones who are going to protect this nation. LOL! You're little more than conspiracy-nut crybabies.

I own a couple of guns. The difference between you scaredy-cat gun-geek Conservatives and normal Americans is that the rest of us don't consider them to be genital extenders.

Quit crying, turn off Rush "Limpy" Limbaugh, and get a life.

2007-01-14 17:28:53 · answer #9 · answered by Crybaby Conservatives 2 · 3 1

Would never happen. Were they outlawed in when Clinton was President ? No.

2007-01-14 17:28:47 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

listen, americans, no offense but especially in the South east, will NOT stand for outlawing firearms, and i seriously doubt they will ever be, its in the constitution, no dumb a-s-s will ever be stupid enought to outlaw them, thats asking for assassination.

2007-01-14 17:20:24 · answer #11 · answered by Daniel C 1 · 3 0

fedest.com, questions and answers