2007-01-14 16:04:08 · 34 answers · asked by michael W 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
nope
2007-01-14 16:06:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I don't believe Kerry would have either if he had been elected or Clinton. Since when do American Presidents fight in wars? That is why they are the Commander In Chief or didn't you realize that? FDR was the President during World War 2 and there were 50 times the casualties that we have had in Iraq yet nobody questioned this? Had we had this sorry excuse for a generation and the media during that time, we would have lost that war and been subjected to Japanese or German rule! Think about your question on reason next time instead of your obvious dislike for President Bush.
2007-01-14 16:12:48 · answer #2 · answered by toughguy2 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. All 4 of your factors are fake: a million) White abode staffers were arrested indicted and positioned accountable or plead accountable to type of crimes. Male Prostitute Jeff Gannon Guckert visited the White abode over one hundred circumstances. The criminal professional everyday is a liar, Bush and Cheney violated the structure and must be impeached. Bush administration is morally bankrupt. 2) A doubtful truth at superb 3) the midsection type has decreased in length lower than Bush and larger wealth is targeted in the fingers of fewer people in the U. S. than any time because the 1890's. 4) "No baby left in the back of" has had no substantial impact on coaching in the U. S. and the rustic lags in the back of Europe, Japan and Korea in the widely used of coaching. No political pupil i recognize of would price Bush as a good president, maximum price him the the worst ever.
2016-10-31 03:19:57 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no because he is to old
but seriously every person on this place bags on bush how would you like it living in iraq with saddam husein and you being gassed give the man respect he hasnt led the world to complete destruction and i am sick and tired of hearing bush this bush that shut up we have heard all the $%^&*ing about him seriously you would not last one dayas president a ait another year and its over my god the troops in iraq are there by there choice they signed a paper that said i will defend this country from foreign or domestic attacks it was there choice to join the armed forces so stop your complaining its not like they were drafted they went into the military on there own free will
by the way the only reason why you people are complaing is because of the war i am sure every one is tired of hearing about it please shut up you have your opinions about him keep them to your self . and he is the comander in cheif so he has the right to send people to iraq or any other country in the world for oil and he has to cover it up and say it was wepons of mass destruction.
thatnk you for your time
2007-01-14 16:18:29 · answer #4 · answered by paintballa 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes if he was still young I think he would. I think now he would not be a good steward with his abilities and position if he did go and fight in Iraq.
2007-01-14 16:08:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope
2007-01-14 16:08:00 · answer #6 · answered by HaHa Thats Funny!!! 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I bet he'd be as willing to go to Iraq as he was Vietnam.
2007-01-14 16:08:00 · answer #7 · answered by Vita 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A draft dodger fighting in Iraq?
Let me think about that for a minute....
hmmm....
No
2007-01-14 16:10:06 · answer #8 · answered by Alex 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope
And neither do those who support the war but aren't in the army.
2007-01-14 16:07:18 · answer #9 · answered by Wandering Sage 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No way...he ducked military service once before.
2007-01-14 16:08:26 · answer #10 · answered by fdm215 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
he had his chance in 1968
2007-01-14 16:08:38 · answer #11 · answered by kman1830 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋