Might as well.
2007-01-14 13:28:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by robert m 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I explored this idea in a graduate college paper some years in the past, yet I continually idea it changed into somewhat cynical. in case you study Donald Rumsfeld's article in overseas Affairs, that got here out round summer season 2002, he advocates a de facto overseas legion frame of mind, with information from lauding the way the initial marketing campaign in Afghanistan changed into fought, making use of a blend of SF and CIA paramilitary gadgets on the floor, optimum indigenous proxy forces, and making use of our overwhelming technological superiority in area and air platforms to grant tremendous firepower. also, it is going to likely be said that the U. S. military already has a touch legionnaire sense to it - we already have many immigrants serving contained in the protection rigidity as a shortcut to citizenship. even at the same time as i changed into contained in the military, many years in the past, my straightforward preparation company had better than some Puerto Ricans and Jamaicans and different overseas nationals who were serving contained in the protection rigidity to receive US citizenship. The French overseas Legion changed into formed explicitly with the objective of allowing the French authorities to launch protection rigidity expeditions that would not be democratically supported if the French human beings had to pay with their own blood for that type of adventurism. If a democracy needs to apply rigidity, yet perceives that its own human beings do not help the reason adequate to tolerate casualties, that to me is an illustration that this variety of use of rigidity is ill-cautioned. i don't believe of there's a worse message shall we deliver to the international today - that human beings are smooth with higher protection rigidity adventurism, as long as its paid with the blood of foreigners, and not in any respect their own. to boot, our reliance on indigenous proxies in Iraq has been a disaster - many New Iraqi military battalions are literally not strive against efficient, unwilling to paintings mutually different Iraqis, or are de facto militias whose real loyalties are to the Sunni insurrection factions or Shia or Kurdish political activities. For a number of those causes and bigger, i might want to ought to vote "nay" hostile on your decision.
2016-12-02 06:45:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes. It would be a great way for immigrants to earn their citizenship.
2007-01-14 13:32:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by Aegis of Freedom 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sure so we can get into more wars..like the DONKEY NATION we already are.
We cannot run this nation much less the rest of the world...we are LOSERS in IRAQ....because we are losers period
2007-01-14 13:29:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
No. I think it's better if those wearing our uniforms have a stake in this country.
2007-01-14 13:25:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by yupchagee 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
What for?????
2007-01-18 11:52:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No.
2007-01-14 13:26:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by DAR 7
·
0⤊
0⤋