everyone knows ps3 is way better than the 360 by far. better graphics mothion sensing tech like wii and plays blu ray
2007-01-14 12:39:09 · 12 answers · asked by Im not telling you my REAL name 2 in Games & Recreation ➔ Video & Online Games
forget all the crap these people are telling you. the ps3 will be way better. take a look at the ps2 and the original xbox(not the 360) when they first came out a long with a couple of games, the graphics was okay at the time. but as time moved on, they got better. that could happen to the 360 and ps3. the disks on the ps3 have more memory(hint-more oppertunities to get better graphics, longer gameplay,exc.)so the ps3 will come out to the top. now you hear about all these people complaining that the ps3 is copying the other systems, back when the ps1 came out, it had 3-d graphics. the nintendo 64 copied their idea. the ps3 has a built-in blue-ray disc player. the 360 then made an attachment of the hddvd player on theirs.ps3 is the best.
2007-01-14 13:27:13 · answer #1 · answered by ben h 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ummm.... everyone knows that the Wii is better than both the PS3 and Xbox360 combined.... The 360 released way too early and the PS3 copied the Wii's motion sensing but FAILED MISERABLY because they're like "ooohhhhh yea u can tilt the controller YAYYY" and the Wii is all about interactment.... so screw the PS3 ($600) and the Xbox360 ($400) and go get the best system of the three (it's also the cheapest - $250). The Wii pwns the other two systems by a long shot!
2007-01-14 12:55:18 · answer #2 · answered by e l 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The PS3 is better in that it has more computing power however at this time we haven't seen it's full potential. The Xbox 360's game library is larger and the 360 is less expensive but in the next 4 to 6 months we will begin to see what the PS3 really can do. As far as the cost, the PS3 is actually a bargain considering all it's features and that it costs a little over $800 (NPD) to produce. So even at $600 the PS3 is actually a good deal.
2007-01-14 12:50:53 · answer #3 · answered by Celidus 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well because of the cell having 8 processors and xbox 360 having 1 of course it will, and most games out for ps3 barely use the full capability of the cell... probally only uses 2 of the 8 processors for now because to develop a game bigenough and totally rendering it all will take a while, probally by july you'll see the true power of the cell and PS3 and to put in prespective a processor is a chip used to process data... usaully computers have only 1 of these except the new intel core duo processors which is 2 processors, so this should tell you how strong a PS3 is to out power a PC
2016-05-24 03:00:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
But 500 to 600 Dollars plus games
2007-01-14 12:42:35 · answer #5 · answered by jarrodwood2003 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
actually it really isn't. PS3 gets beat in graphics. For now. Except the blu-ray is pretty good.
2007-01-14 13:35:47 · answer #6 · answered by Donovan G 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
first of all the motion sensing is nothing like wii just tilt tilt tilt. second yes graphics r the same as 360 and THE GAMEPLAY, wat iu buy a system 4 CRAP. 360 is more fun. not even vibrating. its a overpriced interactive Dvd player. or ****.
get wii its more fun
2007-01-14 12:56:49 · answer #7 · answered by Emedi E 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
actually, don't take me wrong but i don't think ps3 is better than 360.
some people can't even play the ps3 on their tv because
it only works on high definition tvs.
2007-01-14 12:46:45 · answer #8 · answered by k 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
#1:has copied xbox360 with the power button on the control
#2:copied wii w/ the motion senscored
#3:has all gay games except 1 game(rfom)
#4xbox 360 has GEARS OF WAR u retard
2007-01-14 12:47:31 · answer #9 · answered by V Uchiha 1 · 1⤊ 2⤋
yes it is better but their prices are high and not much games released for it.
2007-01-14 12:57:06 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋