2007-01-14 11:53:00 · 9 answers · asked by Me ! 1 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
They are this decades dynasty..
2007-01-18 11:40:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I know im going to get a lot of heat for this but the Patriots are better than the 90s cowboys. Im sure cowboys have better stats but take into consideration how many all pros the cowboys had and how many all pros the patriots have? During the 90s the cowboys were in the top 5 of most of the offensive and defenisve categories with many pro bowlers and potential HOF. Look at the patriots, they lost Branch and Patten and had injuries and they still manage to find ways to beat teams that are better than team physically and statistically. Its a combination of good coaching and Tom Brady. People are going to hate saying they keep winning in the last minute with a field goal. Thats what makes a team great the ability to win in the clutch. Anyone can play well if they have the lead but how many teams can play well in the clutch consistently.
2007-01-14 20:05:22 · answer #2 · answered by jason j 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
If so, then who are the Patriot's triplets? Dallas had Aikman, Smith, and Irvin, who do the Patriots have? Oh yeah, they won't pay their players, so it keeps changing. Nevermind, their dynasty is over.
2007-01-14 20:12:42 · answer #3 · answered by john k 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, the Patriots are just lucky. Nobody on that team has talent, they just get lucky. I cannot wait til the day that Bill Belichick dies.
2007-01-14 20:21:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
As in, each being a dynasty, I say yes
2007-01-14 19:57:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
not this year
2007-01-14 19:58:17 · answer #6 · answered by kfcchickenlegs 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I wouldn't go that far, but they're doing great.
2007-01-14 19:57:07 · answer #7 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
THE PATRIOTS ARE OVERRATED AND LUCKY.
2007-01-14 19:56:51 · answer #8 · answered by smitty 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
No
2007-01-14 20:07:41 · answer #9 · answered by AL IS ON VACATION AND HAS NO PIC 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋