No. It proved that he was too young and dumb to be in "love".
2007-01-14 10:59:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by duritzgirl4 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Plays truncate time, so don't get hung up on that part. He knew her more than three days, because don't forget the priest got holed up with plague victims for over a month.
Their love existed against the wishes of both families and they were both young. Given that, and the intensity of their feelings for each for each, I think it did not prove his love, but demonstrated the depth of his felt need for Juliet in his life.
This is a kind of love. The first kind of love, which, if their marriage could have gone forward ordinarily woud have matured into a true, rich, mature, love.
It was a selfish love, but in the sense that all young love is selfish. That does not mean it was not love,just young love.
He has been banished from his country, so without Juliet he had nothing to live for. He had given up everything when his passion led him to kill Tybalt. That he tried to break up the fight with Mercutio tells me his love for her was maturing.
And their deaths reconciled the famlies and brought to light the idiocyof their long feud, and I don't think that would have come about if the love of the two ws not true.
2007-01-14 12:56:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It really only proves that he felt that he couldn't live without her. Many people love each other very much, but do not kill themselves after their spouse dies. Think about all of the elderly people who lose their husband or wife. Just because they don't kill themselves doesn't mean that they didn't love their spouse anymore than Romeo loved Juliet.
Romeo's love was too over the top and too passionate. It was impulsive love. His actions throughout the play demonstrate how impulsive he was.
2007-01-14 12:35:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
those 2 have been 14 and sixteen. In Shakespeare's age they weren't that youthful, and genuinely did not count variety as little ones: Juliet's father wanted her daughter to wed. So, it is can not be a actual argument. What approximately love? Romeo had a weigh down on a woman referred to as Rose on the beginning up of the play. in case you evaluate his reactions approximately this love and that for J. (like, he can not make jokes approximately his feeling approximately J., he even does not tell it to Mercutio, his appropriate chum) the single for J., is actual one. As for Juliet: she appearing like a woman, not as a woman; she's not a dreamer, she does not in the clouds . She is get up against her mum and dad for her love. So, at that very 2nd they actually in love. much greater: it is the previous like to the two considered one of them, and as all of us comprehend: the previous love lasts consistently. If the fireplace is going out, the ideas stand nonetheless.
2016-12-16 04:45:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, he truly loved her. Romeo could not stand to live without Juliet so he killed himself.
2007-01-14 11:05:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by Alletery 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
IF you beleive it was love than I guess you could say he killed himself because he could not live life without her and the thought of it was overwhelming enough for him to do it. IF you beleive it wasn't love you can say he killed himself because he could not face dealing with the aftermath of this forbidden love, thus making him a coward. Oh ye shakespearean types will hate me for saying that i bet.
2007-01-14 11:06:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by CelticFairy 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
They both killed themselves because they couldn't stand the thought of living without the other.
2007-01-14 11:00:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by kj 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you weren't convinced that he "truly loved her" prior to the death scene, then I don't think you read the play very carefully.
2007-01-15 04:09:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by shkspr 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. Both variables are independent from each other!
2007-01-14 11:07:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by malejisa 2
·
0⤊
1⤋