will Pres. Bush succeed in his latest plan for Iraq?

Question

Also, why doesnt Bush attack Iran and Syria? ans solve the problem once and for all.

Answer 1

If president Bush does not succeed in Iraq, the complete region will be embroiled In a Near Nuclear Holocaust.

The USA has troops in the Philippines to train the Philippine army against Muslim extremists. Somalia is under attack by US forces.

In order to stabilize the middle east, the waring factions in Iraq must be eliminated. The complete military of Syria and Iran must be neutralized. They send most of the insurgents and war material Iraq. Iran and Syria will benefit most, if the region falters.

If these measures are not done in the next 6 months, Israel will conduct a first strike at the Iranian Nuclear facilities. Hence, the start of World War number 3. Sixteen years ago, Israel did a first strike against the Iraqi Nuclear facilities which were built by the French government.

In conclusion: Bush is not the best we have. Soon he will be out of office. The next president, whom ever that is, will face the same problems. The problem will not go away. By the way, the Sept 11 attack was first planned as a nuclear attack on the USA...Terrorists scientists voted against that attack....Too many USA causalities. Also, the only female terrorist was a student at MIT and she was from Pakistan... MIT was gracious enough to give her all of the computer resources to do her *thesis*...in reality the lady from Pakistan did all of the logistics planning for the 9/11 attack....she was a Math major and an expert in probablity and statistics at MIT.

Thanks,

Sandy

Answer 2

i imagine people could quit with each and each of the armchair quarterbacking. I undergo in concepts each and each of the bitching because people were claiming that he did not deliver sufficient troops ( even notwithstanding as president he follows the suggestion the generals on the floor says what they favor) and convinced there'll always be those who disagree, now he's sending in additional suitable troops we get an same armchairs quarterbacks saying that this is a mistake. I truly have come to the top that the Bush haters is largely a psychological condition and no remember what this president do there is going to be a jerk reaction from them that announces incorrect decision.

Answer 3

Nope, it's a LBJ move. We will be there until Jesus makes a guest appearance at the Apollo. They are trying to use a stripped down version of the Powell doctrine.

Secretary Powell turned out to be right once again. I'll never understand why he went on the crazy side.

Answer 4

As long as Nancy Pelosi and all the other Liberal pukes keep their noses out of it.
Are you kidding he's getting enough grief over the Iraq war, he would be dragged and hung for that... I mean the thought of our president trying to protect his people and country! No, we have to play nice so that the rest of the world like us, even though they still won't. HE SHOULD NUKE THEM IN MY OPINION.

Answer 5

Why attack Iran and Syria? To make more angry and hateful toward Americans? Isn't one unjust war enough? By latest plan for Iraq do you mean sending more soldiers there to guard oil fields owned by Halliburton, who Dick Cheney used to be the CEO for? I suggest you do some reading before you want to attack more countries.

"The Halliburton Agenda"
http://www.powells.com/cgi-bin/biblio?inkey=62-0471638609-0

"Iraq, Inc. A Profitable Occupation"
http://www.sevenstories.com/Book/index.cfm?GCOI=58322100484530

"Dick: The Man who is President"
http://www.powells.com/cgi-bin/biblio?inkey=1-1565848403-2

All classified as Non-Fiction and therefore cannot have a liberal bias.

Answer 6

We better hope so, even though many want us to lose.
If Bush loses, we lose.

Answer 7

You grossly overestimate the power of the USA

The USA is a house of cards with an idiot at the wheel and YOU wanna start more WARs......

Answer 8

For all of our sakes, lets hope he can. Its in all our best interests.

Answer 9

Can you say Vietnam?

Answer 10

i hope.