2007-01-14 09:55:40 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I'm talking strictly about the destruction that is going to happen once the US throws 20,000 more troops into Baghdad hornets nest city of 6 million people.
2007-01-14 15:07:20 · update #1
lol Wouldn't that be something? No, I think it will be remembered as a Vietnam- only thing it will be remembered as it was a 15-16 year mistake and embarressment and disasterious war for the americans.
2007-01-14 10:12:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
As in what way? That to keep and maintain Baghdad's freedom will win the war?
The Battle of Stalingrad (1942-43) was a major turning point in World War II. While not Germany's first setback, it was one of the most important, and one from which it never fully recovered.
1)During World War II both Soviet Red Army and German Wehrmacht forces suffered hundreds of thousands of casualties, many from infectious disease.
2)Stalingrad tularemia epidemic of 1942-1943 was a natural outbreak. Although somewhat suspect because of the possible biases and political overtones, Soviet-era published epidemiological reviews of tularemia during the battle of Stalingrad help corroborate our view that a complete breakdown in public health infrastructure led to the epidemic. pulmonary involvement in tularemia infections (95.2%) during the battle of Stalingrad caused by inhaled dust from infected straw.
2007-01-14 18:11:51 · answer #2 · answered by Akkita 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, the Russians won that battle.
2007-01-14 17:59:11 · answer #3 · answered by Kwan Kong 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't think so..... there are very few blizzards in Baghdad.
2007-01-14 18:32:02 · answer #4 · answered by lordkelvin 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, the situations are in no way comparable.
2007-01-14 18:20:45 · answer #5 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋