...then it wouldn't be unexpected anymore, would it? And if you always expect the unexpected, then the expected would acually be the unexpected, wouldn't it?
2007-01-14 07:51:36 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science ➔ Psychology
I think the statement simply means that one needs to be prepared for alternate consequences to our actions.........what you think "always" happens may not be true, so you should "expect" different actions/reactions/solutions, etc
2007-01-14 08:00:12 · answer #1 · answered by Lady Lynnea 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah of course! We would be caught in to words always like your messy jargons. Let me ask you in your own way.
If you know the unknown one...?
...then it wouldn't be unknown anymore, would it? And if you always know the unknown one, then the known one would actually be the unknown one, wouldn't it?
So, be known for the known people to know about youself for some unknown help in an unknown time for you!
2007-01-14 08:44:25 · answer #2 · answered by yozenbalki 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you shouldn't read that much into it. Basically if you don't expect anything then anything is possible good or bad
2007-01-14 07:54:47 · answer #3 · answered by King Davin 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋