In Friday's episode Tracy cut her hand AFTER she hit Charlie, therefore there was no blood on the ornament. Will the police notice?
2007-01-14 07:23:49 · 12 answers · asked by mistymiss 6 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Television
Grodno. I'm almost sure she used both hands, but maybe I'm wrong.
2007-01-14 07:52:17 · update #1
Come on, you're way too smart and are obviously in the REAL world. This is the land of soap opera you're talking about, nobody ever notices the practical things, like when Pauline died in EastEnders and Michelle never came back, that is so unreal, of course you would return for your mother's funeral.. Aren't soaps just becoming dull, boring, drab and soooo freakin' predictable nowadays? (I mean I know the same things happen to different people, but now it's just so boring) Don't you agree?
2007-01-14 07:41:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Loads of things were wrong with her story 1, Charlie told Steve he was dumping her, 2, The police would know from which angle she whacked him with, I mean its hard to be threatening to someone with a knife sat down. 3, her fingerprints would be on the opening of the suitcase not Charlies. 4,she had a cut on the inside of her hand and the outside. There are loads of mistakes in her story.
As for Eastenders the police would have done a postmortem anyway. She had high blood pressure but so do loads of people, they would just not have turned around and said, "ahh yes she had high blood pressure, nevermind have a funeral"
2007-01-15 03:54:17 · answer #2 · answered by Smiley_1714 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The hand she cut may not have been the same hand she held the ornament with, but she put the knife in Charlies left hand , I'm not sure if he was left handed.Anyway it was a terrible thing to do and I don't think it should be shown as entertainment.
2007-01-14 07:38:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
countless themes have been incorrect jointly along with her tale a million, Charlie stated Steve he grow to be dumping her, 2, The police would desire to be responsive to from which strategies-set she whacked him with, I recommend its stressful to be threatening to somebody with a knife sat down. 3, her fingerprints would desire to be on the hollow of the suitcase not Charlies. 4,she had a shrink on the interior her hand and the exterior. There are countless blunders in her tale. As for Eastenders the police would have accomplished a postmortem besides. She had intense blood rigidity yet so do countless human beings, they'd purely not have grew to become around and stated, "ahh particular she had intense blood rigidity, nevermind have a funeral"
2016-10-19 23:33:45 · answer #4 · answered by lander 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If the TV police are anything like our real police, probably not.
That kind of thing is far too complex for them to notice.
2007-01-18 11:14:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its Coronation Street cause they will notice, but not until the last minute.
2007-01-19 05:30:09 · answer #6 · answered by Sassy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Tracy is doomed. She will be going down for a loooong time.
2007-01-20 20:18:38 · answer #7 · answered by Afi 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
charlie is right handed but she placed the knife in his left hand
omigod i should be a detective!
2007-01-19 22:38:55 · answer #8 · answered by peter p 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Did you also notice that it was her that opened the cutlery drawerto give charlie the knife???
2007-01-14 07:41:44 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes, i tried phoning them up but they didn't want to know , so told CSI , they ll get back to me.
2007-01-18 04:01:00 · answer #10 · answered by NIGEL R 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋