2007-01-14 06:47:41 · 16 answers · asked by Rachel T. 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Then he would be on a roll as a failure.
2007-01-14 06:51:11 · answer #1 · answered by johN p. aka-Hey you. 7 · 11⤊ 6⤋
appears like that police usual is in with the Taliban. Why else ought to he say US troops are needed? i'm sorry yet this dem believes in getting those behind 9/11. Bush must have by no skill invaded Iraq and wasted the time, elements and the lives of our service adult adult males and women by technique of forsaking them in Afghanistan. that is possible the Taliban ought to were forced out by technique of now and their practise grounds leveled. that is possible Ben weighted down does not were waiting to flee to Pakistan. we will by no skill recognize because of W's incompetence and ego. ############### CINNER: Are you for genuine? You heavily imagine Bush did good in Afghanistan? Boy, do I actual have a bridge to promote you!
2016-11-23 18:07:19 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
then he would have to admit that the whole idea was a huge waste of lives and money not just in the lives we lost in our troops but the lives of the innocents in the area and the blame for it all lies squarely on his shoulders as the one that never makes a mistake nor admits defeat and to be such only proves what others have said and that is he is not the man for the job he has and should never have gotten the office for he has not brought America together and instead of being a uniter is in fact a divider and his legacy in the history books will bear out the fact that far from being known as the others have been for note worthy things as the one that got us into Iraq and caused us to loss face with the rest of the world, destroyed our reputation throughout the world and made us to be liars his legacy will be one of utter incompetence
2007-01-14 06:56:37 · answer #3 · answered by billc4u 7 · 9⤊ 4⤋
As many wise politicians have suggested... we should do the right way by keeping more troops in Afganistan and ibcrease our troops in some of the genuinely friendly Arab nations, ready and able to keep Iraq ckecked before it ever becomes a jihadist haven. Iraq can only become a jihadist haven if they killed off all those non-jidhadist Iraqi supporters. If Iraq is left with jihadists, Iraq can be immediately nuked!
2007-01-14 06:56:00 · answer #4 · answered by United_Peace 5 · 6⤊ 6⤋
So many people and still so clueless...
If we fail in Iraq, then Iran and Syria will take charge by over running the fledgling government of Iraq and the oil production capabilities will then be controlled by two countries who support and export terrorism. Iran is currently so mismanaged that even while sitting atop of the world's third largest known oil deposit, not only could they not export a single drop last year, they had to instead, import more! Get the picture?
If we fail in Iraq, we will ultimately be isolated economically and the cost of living will skyrocket beyoned measure.
If we fail in Iraq, there will be great bloodshed there,and terrorism will again visit our shores.
2007-01-14 07:06:21 · answer #5 · answered by Doc 7 · 4⤊ 8⤋
It WILL fail. This is Stay the Course II PLUS with vitamins and added bodybags and Halliburton profits.
2007-01-14 07:53:36 · answer #6 · answered by rhino9joe 5 · 8⤊ 4⤋
Send in the boy scouts, the girl scouts, All the Amway downline, every police officer and then send all of the Senators and Govenors and what the heck lets all go over there and just build Walmart after Walmart.
2007-01-14 06:51:51 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 6⤋
It obviously *will* fail, and things will only get worse.
Even Republicans are finally realizing what a disaster Bush has created.
2007-01-14 07:22:14 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 4⤋
well .. i think they know what theyre doing and "failing" isnt in the cards ... i think they plan on getting into it with syria and iran ... the worst case scenario i think is if the conflict flares into places like india and packistan and somebody cuts loose a nuke ... things could get ugly real quick .. and i think the US administration is playing with fire ...
2007-01-14 06:52:42 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 5⤋
He will adopt plan (c). Blame and Run . It Was the fault of the Iraqis.
2007-01-14 06:57:42 · answer #10 · answered by amigo 2 · 8⤊ 4⤋
We will have to cross that bridge, when and if we get to it.....Any plan could suceed or fail....Doesnt seem like anyone came up with a better solution
2007-01-14 06:51:31 · answer #11 · answered by PoliticallyIncorrect 4 · 6⤊ 7⤋