It depends how skinny or how curvacious. I think skinny like Victoria Beckam is ill looking and isn't a look i aspire too. I think J-lo has an out of proportion body, huge bum and no bust. I wouldn't want that either. I think Scarlett Johanson has a nice body, a beautiful hour glass figure. I would aspire to that look more, it is effortless and feminine. You don't want to look like you are trying too hard. But either way its best to try to get to a weight that suits your own body. I don't look good too skinny as i loose all my curves and look a bit gaunt. But I don't look good fat either, a size ten (UK) is what suits me best.
2007-01-14 06:17:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by harvestmoon 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
It all depend on the looks of the person! They are some women
who is medium size and even Little larger but not LARGE or EXTRA LARGE, and most of all then a woman or even a man who looks like they are PREGNANT that's not looking too nice! If a woman is large but there belly is small or medium that's OK. but
I cannot stand a LARGE BELLY woman. A person should not leave
them self gets out of controled, and some people just do not care
and they just EAT,&. EAT,&.AET. till they looks like an elephant.
That's not right because it also medically bad for them, so Ans. to
your Ques. is bib but not over size and not with a big belly not @ all. The other thing some big woman can be still be active and nimble, so the only thing is that over sized Belly but some woman can be good looking too it's all depend. but I will still Answer your Question. Large woman but small or midum wase!
2007-01-18 05:32:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by norman j 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Victoria Beckham should not be given so much as a fraction of the column inches she is given.
She epitomises how one should never look. She has always denied a boob job. But ladies out there how many women do you know can go from lets say a size 12 to size 8 or 6 and their boobs not shrink along with the weight loss?
She is visually vomit-inducing. I do not advocate violence but her pouts (and her posy facial expresions) make me want to yank her through the tv screen and smack her.
J-Lo physically lovely. Her singing voice, "stop strangling the cat"!
2007-01-14 21:07:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by The Cat 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Curvaceous.
2007-01-14 06:00:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
they are both extremes - victoria is unattractively thin, whilst J-Lo has a great face and upper body but her bottom and legs are simply fat in my opinion - an attractive curvaceous figure is someone like Catherine Zeta Jones, I think she is a better representative of the curvy shape - I would opt to have her figure if I had the choice!
2007-01-14 10:23:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by Nikita 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Meeno...that's c-r-u-e-l, but the truth always hurts - but in Victoria's case, it's not only her body...but her aura and attitude. Okay, it could be said that the press (and public) has given her heat over the years, but damn - a bit like Princess Diana, in the beginning she was an attention freak - nobody bothered telling her the press will be around her like hungry rats until we see another sweet lassie who wants a bit of it also.
Jennifer edges it...but seen better - and I'm afraid Latino women will always turn me into a steaming old pervert! Hope you don't mind me calling her Jennifer, as 'JLo' makes me think of American bottom cream of the 70's!
2007-01-14 06:16:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Curvaceous!!!
2007-01-14 06:21:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by angela_veillon 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Curvaceous looks better.
2007-01-14 08:25:19
·
answer #8
·
answered by Sunshine Suzy 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Curvaceous hun. I like to feel a woman when im doing her from behind and also dont get worried that i would snap her
2007-01-14 06:06:07
·
answer #9
·
answered by Happy 07 1
·
1⤊
1⤋
The curvaceous. That's what turns me on.
2007-01-14 06:03:14
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋