English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

from laws

2007-01-14 05:02:40 · 16 answers · asked by Republicans tjhink bush nevr lie 1 in Politics & Government Politics

16 answers

Don't confuse Republicans with the neocon nut-cases that have hijacked the party temporarily. Their time is about done, and they do protect their own.

Is Rush back from his last boy-toy trip to South America yet?

2007-01-14 05:10:50 · answer #1 · answered by Gaspode 7 · 4 0

Wow. Liberals are certainly not burdened with the truth or honesty. First off, Foley's occurrences were with an 18 year old. Last time I checked, Libs were all about private lives of adults being private. Secondly, when the Repubs do identify a problem with one of their own, you see what happens. Foley is gone. Where is Ted Kennedy, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, etc etc etc....oh my, I just named the leadership of the Democratic party, didn't I? Wow. That's interesting.

2007-01-14 05:15:13 · answer #2 · answered by bully 2 · 0 1

Let's see... Foley sent suggestive IMs to an 18 year old boy, and was forced to resign by the Republicans.

Rep. Studds took a 17 year old male page to Europe and had depraved sexual intercourse with him, and the Democrats "censured" him, and he went on to win more re-elections as a Democrat.

So, who's protecting child predators?

2007-01-14 05:18:34 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

if I'm not mistaken wasn't the page foley harassed of age? i could be way off base and apologize if i am but i seem to remember this story being more hype than fact. if however, i am correct would democrats apologize for bashing the idiot foley or start bashing what clinton did to an of age page while in the oval office? if the page that foley harassed was underage i would think it a perfect opportunity for democrats to bring charges or censure foley; why has this not happened? i believe that if the page was a minor foley should be charged and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law and republicans be damned if they protect him.

2007-01-14 05:13:22 · answer #4 · answered by David W 3 · 0 2

What about Dem Mel Reynolds pardoned by the Clinton Adm after like 16 charges of about the same thing?

2007-01-14 05:16:56 · answer #5 · answered by Brianne 7 · 0 1

Do you happen to read the news? Ever? Foley got what was coming to him. Pure disgrace.
Conversely, when Gary Studds, democrat from Massachusetts, was caught actually having sex with a teenaged page, he basically walked up to the podium and told us to mind our own business. you hypocrite.

2007-01-14 05:12:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Neddie... some genuine questions (which will tackle your "pseudo-question"): question #a million. Do you recognize that the only "conceal-up" in the Foley case exchange into by utilising the Democratic occasion operatives who sat on a leaked transcript of his sexually exhibit IM's to an 18 12 months-previous ex-website for months before attempting to teach it right into a pitiful October ask your self on the final day that Congress exchange into in consultation before the election? by utilising the way, they have on condition that refused to bare the source of the transcript to the FBI for the period of their learn into the situation...why? P.S. The Republican homestead management demanded and gained Foley's resignation on an identical day that they gained the sexually exhibit IM's. notice: the faster E-mails merely reported "what do you want on your birthday?" and "deliver me a photograph". They weren't sexually exhibit. nonetheless...Foley exchange into reported at that factor and agreed to end. question #2. let us know and all your followers precisely the type you experience a pair of married President of united states of america receiving oral intercourse from a White homestead intern in the oval place of work and then many times mendacity approximately it, including whilst under oath? i've got self assurance that, on the time, the spin out of your ingredient exchange into that “it is merely approximately intercourse between consenting adults” and we could constantly stay out of Clinton’s private lifestyles. notice: the sexually exhibit IM’s have been sent to an 18 12 months previous (grownup) ex-website in a consensual on the spot message verbal replace. question #3. while you’re at it, how did you experience approximately these days deceased Democratic Congressman Gerry Studds easily having had anal intercourse with a 17 12 months-previous male website, turning his returned on the homestead floor as his CENSURE exchange into study and then being reelected 6 circumstances with the endorsement of the Democratic occasion? The Washington positioned up praised him as a “gay pioneer in Congress”…absurd! How can your blind hatred of GWB enable you to sound off with an completely made up slur approximately Bush "masking up" the Foley difficulty? and how can your ingredient of the political spectrum so unashamedly exhibit outrage sooner or later and compliment the subsequent for the two repugnant habit? do not you have adequate self-know to a minimum of attempt to base your "questions" on some information and then be consistent on your ethical outrage???

2016-12-16 04:28:47 · answer #7 · answered by vogt 4 · 0 0

No. The Republicans force their morally challenged members out of office. The Democrats lionize pedophiles like Stubbs, panderers like Franks, and thieves like Jefferson.

2007-01-14 05:13:14 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

No we kick them out unlike the democrats that support theirs like Barney Frank, the late Gerry Studds.

2007-01-14 05:16:35 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

You must get your news from CNN. Why don't you try Fox news for a refreshing change.

2007-01-14 05:17:26 · answer #10 · answered by Snowdog 2 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers