2007-01-14 04:52:14 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Saddam was Reagan's inside guy. Saddam is sort of like Bush's Pervez Musharraf. He is handy and a good guy to have around as long as he doesn't try to get out of your dog leash. It probably means another Republican president, in the distant future, will have to attack Pakistan.
2007-01-14 04:57:44 · answer #1 · answered by Jackson Leslie 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
1. War isn't "good". Why do you short bus riders constantly say this? Do you think if you repeat lies often enough, idiots will eventually believe them and parrot them?
2. Why would Reagan attack Iraq in the 1980's? For what reason?
3. We helped Saddam get loans, and sold him some weapons, but the vast majority of his weapons were acquired from the USSR / Russia and France.
2007-01-14 05:08:18 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The Iraq-Iranian war was a proxy war between the USA and USSR. It didn't matter who we supported, we were fighting the Russians.
2007-01-14 04:58:12 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
War is NOT good.It is the final course of action when diplomacy fails......Regan was a strong President and war was not the answer at the time.
2007-01-14 04:57:30 · answer #4 · answered by PoliticallyIncorrect 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Why was Stalin an ally during WW2? Things change.
2007-01-14 05:03:14 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
politics at the time was difference when regan was president
2007-01-14 04:56:36 · answer #6 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
freakin right!!!
well , answer this bushbots!!
neocons are the enemy of the US of A!!!!
2007-01-14 04:56:44 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋