Okay lets get to the point...who is the better QB, not team but QB.......is it Marino or Brady?
And then ask yourself this would Marino had won a champainship if he was in Brady shoes with the Patriots and vice versa with Brady?
Thanks
2007-01-14 04:50:07 · 12 answers · asked by Nite is Rite 1 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
Tom Brady is a better QB. Yeah I'm sure people will be on my butt about this, but c'mon. Just because the man came before Brady doesn't make him better. I know most people love him because of the history, but you have to think more into it. Marino still has a lot of records left to be broken, but if Marino and Brady where in the same league today. Brady would be A LOT better. Three rings VS. 1 SB appearance. Nuff' said.
2007-01-14 04:59:19 · answer #1 · answered by Nerds Rule! 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Tom Brady is a better QB. Yeah I'm sure people will be on my butt about this, but c'mon. Just because the man came before Brady doesn't make him better. I know most people love him because of the history, but you have to think more into it. Marino still has a lot of records left to be broken, but if Marino and Brady where in the same league today. Brady would be A LOT better.
2007-01-14 05:40:07 · answer #2 · answered by ajtj94 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Brady is definitely a better pick and not just because he has at least three more super bowls than Marino ever will but because the offensive talent that surrounded Marino is far greater than Brady's. Also arguably Brady has been the best clutch player since Joe Montana while Marino was known for "not being able to win the big one". As we've seen putting up big stats isn't the only thing that makes you a good quarterback.
2007-01-14 04:59:50 · answer #3 · answered by TheDoctorofThisStuff 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Marino is the better QB. Ya sure, Brady has three rings, but as you already implied, he had the better team. I'm so sick of everyone saying Brady is the greatest, or even second best behind Manning, he isn't all that. He has some skills, and is great under pressure to be sure, but his accuracy and his decision making are only slightly above average.
2007-01-14 04:57:31 · answer #4 · answered by john k 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Dan Marino is ten times the QB Tom Brady could ever dream of being...Charlie Batch could have been the Pats QB and won some championships...Brady's numbers will never come close to Marino...how dare you compare the two..
2007-01-14 04:55:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Ok, I really hate to answer this question because I'm a Colts fan and Peyton is so much alike Marino. Marino is great but QBs are based on championships; therefore, it is Brady.
2007-01-14 04:56:27 · answer #6 · answered by birdey17 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'd have to say that they are tied. But if one is slightly better than the other, its Brady over Marino.
2007-01-14 04:58:58 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its hard to compare as Marino rarely worked with a talented team such as the one Brady has grown accustomed to.
2007-01-14 05:10:52 · answer #8 · answered by da_hammerhead 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Marino better by a mile.
If the Dolphin defense in his day was anything close to what the Pats had during their heyday years, he would have won it all 3 or 4 times.
2007-01-14 04:54:23 · answer #9 · answered by West Coaster 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Dan Marino, hands down!
2007-01-14 04:56:58 · answer #10 · answered by Rhode Island Red 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋