No, America can see right thru her, and Nancy will be sure and knock the undecided off of the fence on the conservative side.
2007-01-14 03:18:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
1st things 1st - Queen Hill must 1st get the nomination - which she will NOT! Republican candidates: John McCain & Rudy Guliani - neither can win the nomination because they are not looked upon favorably by the base, particularly Rudy - he's pro-choice, pro gay marriage, pro affirmative action & anti-2nd amendment. He screwed up by not running against Hillary for the Senate - he's the only one who could have beaten her. George Allen of Va is a very viable candidate, though his defeat in th '06 election is a negative. The best candidate for '08 is going to be Newt Gingrich - the one true statesman & a brilliant historian that will be in the race. No way are the American people let the Clintons back into the White House.
2007-01-14 03:50:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
When I see questions such as the one below yours, about the "Alquaidacrats (Im still laughing over that one) I think very depressed thoughts about how this country is going to be after I retire. When people feel it's alright to spew the hatred and anger and fear they're feeling. When people feel they have no other option than to promote divisiveness, bigotry and fear. They know they can't use the "N Word" anymore, so they switch to another label which terrifies them: "Alquaida" (their spellin, not mine). Man where did all the rational people in this country go?
Personally, as a single male registered Republican who voted Democrat in the last election, I would like to see a female take a serious run at the job. But Im not convinced Hillary Clinton is the answer, and can you imagine how NUTS us Republicans will get to know "Slick Willy's back banging interns in the Lincoln bedroom"? LMAO Oh man, Jay Leno would get on his KNEES for the jokes he would slice off that situation.
Besides, you better be able to bring on either a minority man or another woman to be VP, or else, some good ole boy in this country will just kill the female President.
Chris Rock said it best, they have a white president and a black VP, Rock himself would shoot the President, go to jail and be a black hero for putting a black man in the Oval Office. One reason I think Bush Sr wasn't seriously threatened with assassination was Dan Quayle. NO ONE was crazy enough to want that guy in charge. No one wants to take out his son either, but more fear of Cheney being in charge. Honestly, Im a big guy, that guy scares me. He is seriously nuts and Im amazed he hasnt tried to orchestrate something to get Bush attacked, however minorly (a plane or a train or a hopsital he had just dedicated blows up, or Air Force One was missile locked, something of that nature, not backed up by any evidence) just to get Bush some approval through sympathy, to reinvent support for him.
Personally, I would probably vote for John McCain with Obama or Hillary as VP. LOL never happen but I would vote that ticket. How much more "Fair and Balanced" could you get?
2007-01-14 03:30:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
you think, you think you think, again absolutly not something to again up or clarify why you think. If there replaced into or is added dirt on Obama we ought to ascertain about it. as well what should be worse for a political candidate then being called a thorough muslim who would not salute the flag and replaced into sworn on by technique of putting his hand on the quran. sure all declare were debunked, notwithstanding it obviously damage Obama. The conflict adverse to the Republican nominee will be a breeze compared to scuffling with Hillary Clinton. Obama has shown his skill in being this on the fringe of defeating Hillary. Now, in case you seem on the final election from the perspective of the electoral map, i imagine we democrats should be frightened about electing Hillary. I see no caution signs and indicators that Hillary ought to win any state (as well AK) interior the south. and she or he will be able to have a difficult conflict adverse to McCain interior the added liberal swing states like Ohio, the position Hillary has a sturdy unfavorbility score and McCain will draw liberals, and inpendents to his facet. I see little or no to no danger for Hillary to win extra states then Gore and Kerry did, which will recommend a minimum of yet another 4 years of a republican president.
2016-11-23 17:45:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The republicans actually have at least a dozen candidates going for the nomination including Guliani, Mit Romney, and as of Friday representative Ron Paul threw his hat into the bid for president.
Hillary might appeal only to the most hardcore democrats but I doubt moderate liberals will take her bait, she is far too pro-war for some.
2007-01-14 03:21:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by IRunWithScissors 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
I hope not. I hope someone anti-war will win easy against Republicans in 2008.
2007-01-14 03:20:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by Longhaired Freaky Person 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Actually Hillary hasn't announced.
And she has a long way to go before securing the nomination.
The American public is tired of anyone with a last name or Bush or Clinton.
2007-01-14 03:23:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by Feelsgood 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
No, I believe a more moderate democrat will get the nomination. Either Obama or perhaps Bill Richardson from New Mexico.
2007-01-14 03:22:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by John S 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
No because her own party doesn't like her. I used to be a Democrat, but because of people like her, I left. She's not really a liberal (see her stance on video games and censorship). Many women won't vote for her because she didn't divorce Bill (stupid reason, personally, as that is her business). And she really sucks are seeming sincere.
2007-01-14 03:20:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
No ... thank God! The only reason she has the support level she does have is that the Republicans have had difficulty finding a quality candidate (for the last several elections).
What I wouldn't do for a Kennedy-Goldwater election ... and that was before I was born.
2007-01-14 03:20:10
·
answer #10
·
answered by Fletch 2
·
0⤊
2⤋