i hope so
2007-01-14 03:05:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Mr. Bush isn't going to do anything. By contrast, President Bush is a leader of the executive branch of the United States of America. As such he will do what has to be done in accordance with his job. Undo speculation by ignorant people on the Internet will serve to do nothing but inflame masses of more ignorant people. The United States does have enemies. The United States' allies have enemies. Self-defense and the defense of allies is not questionable; it is mandatory. Before one goes spouting about a situation it is appropriate to actually know what you are talking about.
2007-01-14 03:13:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by Jack 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Who is planning what againsy whom?
CARACAS, Venezuela - Venezuela's Hugo Chavez and Iran's Mahmoud Ahmadinejad — fiery anti-American leaders whose moves to extend their influence have alarmed Washington — said Saturday they would help finance investment projects in other countries seeking to thwart U.S. domination.
The two countries had previously revealed plans for a joint $2 billion fund to finance investments in Venezuela and Iran, but the leaders said Saturday the money would also be used for projects in friendly countries throughout the developing world.
"It will permit us to underpin investments ... above all in those countries whose governments are making efforts to liberate themselves from the (U.S.) imperialist yoke," Chavez said.
2007-01-14 03:12:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Sure looks that way, doesn't it. What kills me is that Bush will threaten Iran and Syria and call that foreign policy. The guy just doesn't learn, nor does he want to even try to negotiate peace.
2007-01-14 03:16:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by Third Uncle 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
we do not have the troops to attack Iran. Our strength is in our ability to blow up any country. Iraq is about Oil and Money.
2007-01-14 03:08:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by jl_jack09 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Possibly yes. But it would be political suicde for him and his henchmen. And it would be very bad for the U.S.
2007-01-14 10:44:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by Zezo Zeze Zadfrack 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
ya i think so too. and may be after some times you can say so for south korea
2007-01-14 03:07:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by foney 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Some people think so but all i know is that he sending like more troops 2,000 or over ithink
2007-01-14 03:05:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
This is what Mr. Bush is all about...cover-ups...
Never a plan but oodles of cover-ups.
.
2007-01-14 03:05:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by Brotherhood 7
·
1⤊
4⤋
I do not think he would tell you, I happen to know that if it is necessary then he will, in spite of the yellow liberal howling.
2007-01-14 03:04:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
if he was going to cover it up, why did he make a point of naming Iran AND Syria in his speech?
did you even watch it?... or read the transcript even?
or do you get your news on yahoo answers?
2007-01-14 03:05:06
·
answer #11
·
answered by chumpchange 6
·
2⤊
4⤋