English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I just read a question that another member posted, im a little angry that the president is letting all illegal immigrants amnesty and letting them have our social services(social security medicaid etc) when in fact its a well known fact that when our children need those services there will be none, not to mention that even right now its practically impossible to get these services for my parents that were born and raised here and worked their lives away and paid their dues, and yet a foreign person( mexican) can waltz right in as long as they can get past the fence and border patrol and then steal what they have no right to touch(my opinion) our pay rates have declined and over half of the blue collar workers are minorities, so im asking this when they take our money and jobs and our parents savings why on earth do some of you not see a problem with this, and then get so mad when one of us stands up and express" our anger about it? this wouldnt happen in mexico, so why complain??

2007-01-14 02:33:52 · 7 answers · asked by waterboy 4 in Politics & Government Government

7 answers

It ticks me off too, people who sympathize with criminals make me ill. II don't believe they should be entitled to anything unless the come here legally! I have no health insurance for my family at all and I have tried applying for some type of insurance and I was turned down, but yet everyone of them have insurance and everything. There should be no amnesty for them at all. Where I live this used to be a nice family place now it is ghetto-they have ruined my home!! Hopefully Bush will be out of office before he makes that final decision and hopefully the next President will help fix the illegal problem in a fair way.

2007-01-14 02:43:06 · answer #1 · answered by Urchin 6 · 2 0

Ok, point your anger at the right president. Jimmy Carter allowed illegals to draw social security and medicaid. That was the beginning of the Social Security problem that the Democrats say isn't a problem. I agree that it is wrong. If you haven't paid into the system, you shouldn't be allowed to draw money out of it. Just like insurance. If you don't pay for Allstate Insurance (or whoever), they aren't going to pay for you to fix your car. The same should be true for Social Security and Medicaid. Now people say," we can't just let them have no medical care!" To that, I say, "They should have stayed home, then" It is going to bankrupt us in the long run to pay for them all. If they work and pay into the system, I have no problem whatsoever with them drawing benefits from it. But if they don't, well I guess they can go to the free clinic downtown.

2007-01-14 02:43:16 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

i visit. someone mentions that there is in effortless words state supported terrorism and that is not genuine. there is also what's called non-state supported terrorism. it truly is amazingly comparable to what you've only throughout the time of the border in a number of your international locations like Pakistan, Syria, and Iran to call very few. at the same time as their governments received't right now help those communities they both won't be able to administration them or received't. In both case quicker or later someone has to do something or they are going to proceed to salary their type of conflict at the same time as hiding in some usa that ought to not administration them or what they are doing. international locations that cry foul and declare their sovereign proper to not have the integrity of their borders violated could then administration those human beings and communities and by no skill enable them to habit operations outdoors those borders. that is why a number of those communities perform out of the places they do. at the same time as those international locations haven't any tremendous love for each person in certain in addition they lack the elements and protection pressure and regulation enforcement applications to administration those communities and what they do. If those international locations want their borders respected then they ought to deliver those areas less than some type of administration and the individuals in them.

2016-11-23 17:41:33 · answer #3 · answered by cerchia 4 · 0 0

I think it is past time for all middle-class Americans to start protesting, anyway every way - write to the local & national broadcasting companies and the newspapers and demand the truth....none of the sob stories...just the actual truth about the negative effect of illegal aliens on us, the viewers. This may be the best way for all to understand.....many middle-class Americans don't have time to hunt info on the internet (I am retired) After working, and taking proper care of their children - ferreting out this info is not a priority! We need to make it easy for middle-class Americans to learn the truth! Please contact the media....
BobW - who do you think is picking up the tab for the free clinic down the street?

2007-01-14 04:12:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The politicians see votes. Apparently these politicians are more concerned about new votes than they are in keeping yours. I know my Congresswoman is behind my thoughts and is fighting the illegals immigrant bills. But way too many of the politicians are pandering to them. This crosses party lines so no one party can be attacked on this one.

2007-01-14 02:39:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Because 'they' are started to outnumber us in most places. What is outrageous is....when a person works all of their life, pays into Social Security and another retirement plan.....they can not received BOTH when retiring. If you have paid into it...then WHY can't you get your money back???? Argh!!!!

2007-01-14 02:39:24 · answer #6 · answered by TexasRose 6 · 2 0

America ! ......what a country!
The land of opportunity. Ain't it great.

2007-01-14 03:57:50 · answer #7 · answered by Jack 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers