2007-01-14 02:22:37 · 11 answers · asked by wanda_world2000 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Books & Authors
Scarlett was a very willing partner. One of the sexiest scenes in a movie is Scarlett's smile the next morning. She didn't have to say a word; that smile said it all.
2007-01-14 04:07:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
the unique action picture become cut back fantastically via scene you're pertaining to , a great form of which does no longer be allowed even on the instant via a pair enable us to assert quite unlawful acts. the unique cut back has in basic terms been shown as quickly as at inner maximum participants cinema in Hamburgs purple gentle district in 1978. now and returned copies come approximately on specific seedy web pages on the industry yet i could in basic terms propose you to reveal screen in case you have a good shape as that's fairly wicked.
2016-12-12 11:07:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was not rape, she willingly gave into both their desires. Remember, their relationship had been long established by the time anything physical happened, and if you are referring to the part where he came home and carried her upstairs, they had been married for quite some time. Even though their relationship was tumultuous, that doesn't mean there wasn't genuine love.
2007-01-14 02:31:45 · answer #3 · answered by Enchanted 3 · 4⤊ 1⤋
They were married, & he was jealous how Scarlett was always thinking about Ashley Wilkes, so he was drunk, & wanted Scarlett to love him as he loved her. I do not think it was rape, per se, but just a drunk man's plea with his wife to love him the most, & not this other man. I really understand why he felt that way, though. I do feel bad for the poor guy. How'd you like it if your spouse was always thinking of someone else as you're holding them? Not great, right? So, Rhett did what any jealous man might've done.
2007-01-14 02:34:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 6⤋
It was not rape; it was drunken passion on both of their parts. Remember Scarlett's nature? She could easily have escaped Rhett had she wanted to. In the movie, remember the look on Scarlett's face in the morning; she looked like a cat just finishing a bowl of cream.
Side note: in that era, there was no such concept of a man raping his wife. This 'crime' is a recent concept introduced into the law.
2007-01-14 02:42:13 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 5⤋
willing to do what her husband wanted after all this was the 1800's. a man had certain rights which were different than in to days society
2007-01-14 04:45:42 · answer #6 · answered by Marvin R 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
at the first few minute was rape, then scarlett give up to her own desires and it's not rape anylonger
2007-01-14 02:38:26 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
no means no. it was rape even though she gave in. it does not matter that they were married or what time in history it took place. it also does not matter that she that she was happy in the morning, it was still rape.
2007-01-14 05:03:27 · answer #8 · answered by margaret k 4 · 5⤊ 3⤋
she willingly gave into his desires
2007-01-14 02:24:48 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
It was war time, so it was rape.
2007-01-14 02:24:58 · answer #10 · answered by Biker 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋