I'm trying to guess why you focused on September 1942. We'd been at war for nine months. In the Pacific, we'd won the Battle of Midway, and the marines were fighting in Guadalcanal. In Europe, France had fallen, and we were preparing to invade North Africa.
Most of this involved the War Department, but at that time the State Department was trying to figure out how to deal with Gen. DeGaulle's Free French and with Marshall Petain's Vichy regime. This latter was particularly important because of the presence of the French Fleet, controlled by Adm. Darlan, interned at Toulon. With the Moroccan invasion ahead, the French reaction was important. I think diplomat Robert Murphy, working with Gen. Eisenhower, engaged in some secret talks related to this in Spain, possibly involving some contacts with Franco.
Anyway, this is about all I can think of in the September 1942 timeframe. Maybe something was going on with Chiang Kai-Shek's Chinese nationalists then, but I'm not sure.
Cordell Hull, the Secretary of State, had a long and interesting career. His memoirs, which I read several years ago, runs to two volumes and something like 1800 pages. He grew up in the backwoods of eastern Tennessee, something like Abraham Lincoln. As a young congressman, he became interested in economics, and was instrumental in passing the first income tax in 1913 or thereabouts.
Roosevelt brought him into his administration at the beginning, and for a long time, Hull was one of FDR's inner circle confidantes. With the coming of the war, though, Hull became somewhat marginalized because the world was passing him by. I think there was friction between himself and Edward Stetinius, who may have been Secretary of War.
Joseph Grew, one of the best diplomats in American history, was the longtime U.S. ambassador to Japan, and the go-between connecting Hull and the Japanese government. In the months before Pearl Harbor, Grew was in the middle of everything, trying to avert a war. The Japanese sent two diplomats, Nomura and Kurusu, to Washington, where they spent long weeks in late-night sessions at Hull's apartment trying to work out an accommodation between Washington and Tokyo. The big issue was Japanese aggression in China, and America's punitive countermeasures. These negotiations, of course, failed, and for the most part, Hull was out of the loop during World War II.
Late in the war, his health failed and he had to resign the State Department post. But in 1945 he was the leader of the American delegation at the founding of the United Nations in San Francisco. Hull had worked for this a long time, and is properly given a lot of credit for its formation.
2007-01-14 06:49:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by daylightpirate 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Cordel Hull. who is also the longest serving Secretary of State in American history (1933-1944).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cordell_Hull
2007-01-14 02:19:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
An enemy combatant is defined greater by what he's not, particularly than what he's. What I recommend is that article III of the Geneva Conventions defines who's seen a prisoner of conflict and descriptions features of a POW. To be legally seen a POW, the guy would desire to be struggling with in a uniform consistent with the unit they conflict with, they'd desire to undergo hands brazenly, they'd desire to fly colorations, they'd desire to have a distinguishable chain of command, they'd desire to obey the words and prerequisites of conflict, and others. EC's have not one of the above features and are legally purely recognizable as enemy warring events. An enemy combatant is loosely defined as every physique who takes up hands against america or her allies and does not adjust to worldwide policies of the conventions. considering they at the instant are not POW's, in addition they don't fall below a similar protections or rules. EC's and their rights are enumerated interior the Uniform Code of protection rigidity Justice (UCMJ), which additionally potential that they have no "constitutional" rights, including a civilian trial. they are entitled to representation and an ordeal such as commissioned officers from the quite a few branches of the protection rigidity.
2016-10-19 23:20:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋