changing the school leaving age to 18
if kids didn`t get manage to learn anything by the time theyre 16
many can`t even read
isn`t it obvious that they either can`t or don`t want to learn ?
is it another trick to make unemployment seem less than it is
2007-01-14 01:15:56 · 6 answers · asked by keny 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
SEE EVEN YOU LOT CAN`T EVEN READ THE QUESTION
2007-01-14 01:36:09 · update #1
Yes, you will have a big reduction in the unemployment figures for two years, then it will level out at the lower figure. The unemployment figures are already underestimated by three million. On the face of it, they will pay out less unemployment money, but they will need more teachers, and they will have much bigger discipline problems in schools. It is another panic measure. Previously, they have been trying to stick them all into universities, causing a dumbing down of standards, and an under allocation of kids training for essential trades. Although, that has provided a good excuse to promote unnecessary immigration. Another problem, is that they will be exposed to two more years of left wing indoctrination; maybe that is the real reason. Your question will probably bring out an earlier batch of indoctrinated pupils.
2007-01-14 05:01:29 · answer #1 · answered by Veritas 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
to try and educate the dumb young idiot 15 and 16yr old drop outs, education is not an option. if you dont want to go to school, TOUGH. we dont want young LAZY scroungers sponging off us working folk, anything that might get these lazy bums any sort of a job is a good idea. how about if kids dont want to stay in school till 18 then they should be made to do national service. thatl teach em.
2007-01-14 09:22:55 · answer #2 · answered by theoriginalsource 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The government is not solely responsible for one's instruction. Parents and teachers have to work together to help students be better readers.
2007-01-14 09:21:14 · answer #3 · answered by lou 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the government is suposed to be of the people by the people and for the people , they are there to make the decisions for us as a nation and to protect and SERVE us. as you can see this has been eroded because the people dont take notice and have been dummed down not to care , we have been sold down the river.
2007-01-14 09:27:24 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
They are supposed to keep the country in good shape and safe, How they do do a good job, LOL
2007-01-14 09:23:33 · answer #5 · answered by Champ 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Just think of what would happen if there was no government....Check the news out lately......Boy Just think ????????????? It in the bible that we need governing..........
2007-01-14 09:28:50 · answer #6 · answered by 3-selin 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋