English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-01-14 00:22:36 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science Economics

4 answers

what does fail mean?
there is one pretty good indicator we may have a recession. That is that the longterm interest rates are below short term. This shows that financial people are pessimistic about the future.
There is some uncertainty because of Iran but N. Korea has calmed down as China is putting pressure on them. The real estate market seems to be making a soft landing. Growth right now is fine. Unemployment is low but not so low that we might be too hot. Inflation is low. So the fed is probably going to raise rates but slowly and not by very much. Oil prices are dropping.

I would say we would not enter a recession except for the interest rate inversion. This has a good forecasting (though not 100%) record. I think what ever happens it will be minimal up or down. If you look around you can find proffesional forecasts

Fail? You mean like mad max? Depression? Recession?

2007-01-14 05:23:03 · answer #1 · answered by uncle frosty 4 · 0 0

i would not bet on 2007, but i would bet on it failing sooner afer (within 5 years). We dont have an economic system. In theory we are capitalist and capitalism works, however we have many anti capitalist policies including collective bargaining laws, welfare, social security, most utility companies, and the requirement of liscences to sell real estate and automobiles. With this bizare mismatch of policies and clear economic direction, we are probably set up for failure just and the soviet union failed with no economic policy and plan to follow.

2007-01-14 15:32:08 · answer #2 · answered by nigel 3 · 0 0

i do not comprehend why you look to imagine that we've a "conflict depending monetary equipment"! we've a customer depending monetary equipment it truly is different reason we've subject matters. fairly of operating at Starbucks we ought to always be progression capacity flowers, mass transit, street upkeep, welding and production. lets then make what we favor at abode, we would have a lot less of many stuff, yet nevertheless a lot!!! to boot i do not see how technological understanding and common sense would nicely be used to overtake the monetary equipment. we've a loose marketplace monetary equipment no longer a centrally planned one!!!

2016-10-31 01:49:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

only if liberals are allowed to continue in power. the transfer was done under the guise of finding a solution to iraq. as you can see through the first hundred hours...nothing was done virtually at all and ms. pelosis own words were that the agenda was to get the liberals back in the majority. the legislation offered is largely a regrind of tax and spend issues from the carter era....it didnt work then and doesnt work now.
i spent my two tax cut checks i recieved from the bush administration but im sure being good pelosi...ites...they sent theirs back.....

yeah right.

2007-01-14 00:32:03 · answer #4 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers