2007-01-13 23:46:08 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science ➔ Gender Studies
Ha ha ha, Obviously someone felt threatened by my question and gave me a thumbs down. This question is not sexual in nature people, it's nothing more then a question dealing with equal rights. It's funny who ever voted this down is obviously not in support of equal rights. ; )
2007-01-14 08:50:21 · update #1
I think so, I am personally not offended by it but I think that if women must wear tops so should men, or at least cover the nipples which is all some bathing suits do anyway.
2007-01-13 23:50:24 · answer #1 · answered by S W 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
In many places in Europe men and women go topless on beaches together. I like it that way. I'm offended by neither topless man nor topless woman. I think common sense should dictate when to wear a top and when not too, whether you've got chickboobs, manboobs or noboobs.
Karma.
x
2007-01-14 04:59:05 · answer #2 · answered by angelkarmachic 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Topless is fine. Wearing tops is fine. I'm not particularly offended by the current state of affairs. In the long run, does it really matter if we legislate the amount of skin we see on a person's body? I mean, seriously, should we spend our time and money on this issue? Would you be willing to go to war for this issue? Toplessness is not that important.
2007-01-14 03:28:34 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely!!!! Personally I find the sight of a man's bare chest WAY more offensive that the naked female chest. Men have breasts just like women...albeit smaller. Breasts are not sex organs. The sex organs of the human species are a bit further down on the anatomy. Conversely, since men are permitted to be topless then I am very much in favor of allowing women to run a jackhammer fixing the street topless just like men are allowed to do!!!!! *big grin*
2007-01-14 00:05:47 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Topless men? You must be bored.
This is in regard to a question you answered me on what do the folks of California think about Arnold giving illegals welfare....
You're right, they do have a right to exist, but in their own country if they don't want to respect America's laws and sovernty/the legal process we have to become a citizen. They most definitely are hurting something. They're breaking our laws, and putting strain on America socially, and economically.
2007-01-15 05:43:03 · answer #5 · answered by mojojo66 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
From my experience the only men who like to take off their shirts, shouldn't. The men who like to disrobe seem uniquely unaware they they look horrible.Moreover, nothing is more appealing than a man with back hair and a belly cutting his lawn or cheering his team. yum
Yes, that should be againt the law. Or better idea, would be to require all shirtless men you where pasties. Then when they rip out enough nipple hair to make a wig they'll get the idea that toplessness is a bad idea.
2007-01-14 00:45:11 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I think topless in general should be allowed. Women need to breastfeed eventually and it would be unfair to allow women with babies to go topless and denying the same to women without babies.
2007-01-14 01:45:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No but topless men in Speedos should be banned as nudity.
2007-01-14 00:18:15 · answer #8 · answered by Gone fishin' 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes. It is obscene.
Who wants to ever see some pot bellied, loose skinned, saggy breasted, middle aged guy without shirt on in the summer?
They force us to get a sickening glimpse of them before we divert our eyes in horror and disgust.
Since some guys have no shame or compunction about exposing themselves, they should absolutely pass a law to make it illegal based on obscenity.
2007-01-15 03:48:30 · answer #9 · answered by Jay 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not topless But bottomless yes.
2007-01-13 23:52:52 · answer #10 · answered by Joann S 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋