I believe it is an act to KEEP YOU off balance. After all, the same reporters who are ripping the President an new @$$hole never ask the President WHY he has not released the video tapes the FBI confiscated on 9/11 of the Pentagon attack. There were three outside places the tapes were confiscated; the Shereton Inn, the Citgo gas station and the Va DOT. Surely we would be able to actually see the plane clearly in one of those tapes. It would end all the controversy. Not only should they be released, but the MEDIA, if it were not doing government business, would DEMAND those tapes be released.
The media is not lib or con. It's GOVERNMENT PROPAGANDA. If it were not, some reporter would have gotten to the bottom of 9/11 by now. We'd know what really happened.
What about Building 7? On 9/11 major media was saying it had to have been a controlled demolition. The next day, you never heard about bldg 7 again.
Watch..
http://infowars.net/articles/january2007/120107Misdirection.htm
2007-01-13 20:01:02 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Please, why are no reporters asking the tough questions about the Pentagon and Building 7? Those are the clues, not asking tough questions.
2007-01-13 20:09:19 · update #1
Please give this question a Thumbs Up rating if you agree with my question.
2007-01-13 20:15:50 · update #2
There is no such thing as a liberal media anymore. To have a liberal media you must have reporters who are free to investigate a story until they get the answer, and we have not had that for a long time. All media outlets have been bought up by international corporations and it is not in their interest to report what the bad big boys are doing, for they are some of the bad big boys! So to many top journalists are millionaires, how is it possible for them to side with the underdog? Further news has to compete for ratings now, as no network has an independant news service free of competition for ratings. When you combine these ingredients, you have news for entertainment, offered by members of the establishment, and edited by the chairman of the board of the "Exxon" of news. To get to the bottom of what happened on 9/11 you have to be free to look, and confidant that if you did have a story, your editor would put you on the air with it. This is no longer possible, and you are more likely to hear what really happened from the President of Venezuela than you are from CNN or ABC news! The last time I can remember a viable news effort was happening at all was at the end of the Vietnam war. There were a few stories during Reagan's Presidency, and there was great hay to be made as a reporter getting the skinny on Clinton's bjob, but think about it. Nothing of note has been on the news for over 20 years. 9/11? Not a chance.
2007-01-13 23:16:30 · answer #1 · answered by michaelsan 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
This has become such a well used tool around the world, the deception of illusion. I have just recently seen some footage, so I posted it in the added link, This is part 1 and will be adding part 2 hear in a day or two.
They say - the truth will set you free.
Most minds are best left to wonder, You have opened your train of thought, Very good.
the 1st link looks into Illusion on the people.
If this is something you truly wish to research with a open mind look into the 2nd link also, Warning: This information may have side affects, use with caution!
May the force be with us
2007-01-14 04:29:26 · answer #2 · answered by done 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The media does little investigative reporting anymore and almost all is owned by billionaires like Trump and Murdoch!
There are very few liberal own newspapers and the Manchester Union Leader, in my state, is certainly not liberal! Fox straight out lies!
2007-01-14 04:13:38 · answer #3 · answered by cantcu 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
The works of the media is to balance the events or happening and not to favor either side, however, making it off balance depends on the personality of the person reporting in the media.
2007-01-14 04:12:09 · answer #4 · answered by Jesus M 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The main stream media are all corporate owned, and in the business of preserving the status quo.
Murdoch refuses to say if Fox News is profitable. It may simply be his way to promote fascism.
2007-01-14 04:07:11 · answer #5 · answered by bettysdad 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I'll address this to "fine" and no one else.
Why don't you do your own homework instead of asking dumb questions?
Why can't you write in complete sentences, or haven't you gotten to that subject in fourth grade?
Too bad there is not an age limit here, otherwise little boys like you would have to depend only on comic books for your entertainment.
Get a life, study and read more before you offer up assine questions as if you had the intelligence to debate a serious subject!
2007-01-14 05:18:31 · answer #6 · answered by MechBob 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋
The US media is as "liberal" as Joseph Goebbels. Calling it that displays ignorance or wilful complicity.
.
2007-01-14 04:23:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Even the clowns in the mainstream know that 9/11 was done by Islemofascist terrorists (although they would NEVER use that word). To ask such questions would make them look even more stupid than they already look & destroy what little credibility they have.
2007-01-14 04:11:32 · answer #8 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 0⤊ 5⤋
What we see is not even liberal! Its corporate agenda and brainwashing.
2007-01-14 04:04:02 · answer #9 · answered by soulsearcher 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
The media is liberal no ifs ands or buts.
2007-01-14 04:42:46 · answer #10 · answered by josh m 5 · 0⤊ 4⤋