English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

19 answers

animals that cannot move are killed or eaten by predators, and for some, they are on their own at birth so they need to go find food and shelter humans dont need this due to parents,

2007-01-13 20:03:20 · answer #1 · answered by jokerswild 4 · 0 0

Nothing will come around and eat a baby human. Most baby animals that can't walk after birth are easy pickins in the wild.

2007-01-13 20:01:38 · answer #2 · answered by alwaysmoose 7 · 0 0

Because humans have more time to take care of their babies they are less advanced when they are born. animals such as horses, deer etc their babies can stand up at once because they need to be this advanced in order to survive. They are constantly moving and if they couldnt walk they would be targetted by preditors and wouldnt be able to escape.

Animals that are relient on their parents such as whale calves, chimp and most primate babies, kittens, birds, rodents, marsupials (kangaroos etc) etc can be carried by their parents or live in burrows or nests. They can often carry their young at high speeds to escape preditors. Primates and humans can carry and run with a child and so can marsupials and some reptiles

2007-01-13 20:02:39 · answer #3 · answered by ♪ Rachel ♫ 6 · 0 0

human children were once born a bit later than they are now (and better developed), but with smaller brains. humans have bigger brains now (and bigger heads), and human children had to be birthed earlier to compensate for the bigger heads, or the mothers would be torn open (so as a trade off we are born helpless).

even today, many women give birth in hospitals because there is still a risk something can go wrong. and again to compensate we have common procedures like a c-section or a episitomy.

2007-01-13 20:17:24 · answer #4 · answered by wightbringer 2 · 0 0

Well, actually the baby animals do have a problem making balance for the first time, but then since they are quadipodus(having 4 arms) they can balance their body easily and quickly while humans cannot.

2007-01-15 22:59:05 · answer #5 · answered by vm 1 · 0 0

No, the possibilty of someone giving delivery to an animal is distant. notwithstanding regardless of if this style of element occurs , the offspring will be impotent(unable to reproduce sexually). A mule that's a go between a horse and a donkey is impotent. it may well be puzzling for someone to be impregnated by using an animal as they'd be incompatible. even even if that's achieved by using man made insemination, sexual reproduction, meiosis will be virtually no longer achieveable. The chromosome numbers will be different and pairing will be puzzling. a variety of of chromoses would must be synthesized artificially by using scientists it truly is excellent left to god. The being pregnant would terminate earlier the finished cycle .

2016-10-31 01:38:04 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Upright walking in humans is a recent development, probably as little as 1 - 1.5 million years old. We haven't had much of a chance to encode the behavior deep in our instincts, and much of it has to be learned. At the same time, our gestation period has not kept pace with the increased length of our development time. This is most likely due to a combination of the difficulty in passing a fully developed infant skull through the birth canal, and the already excessive length of time of our natal development.
Factored in with these considerations is a loss of evolutionary pressure to perfect upright walking as soon as possible after birth. Our parental instincts, combined with the luxury of increased resources available to individuals devoted to parenting only, has removed us from a natural selection process to eliminate those who are slow to walk upright.

2007-01-13 20:08:26 · answer #7 · answered by Diminati 5 · 0 0

most of the animals walks a couple of seconds after being born
their mother tries to teach them this after they were born immediately
for human beings a baby has to be taken care of by someone
but the animal has to depend on himself the moment he or she was born this is life and the stronger is the one who can fight and live

2007-01-13 20:03:01 · answer #8 · answered by khatora 3 · 0 0

Fathers involvement in child rearing is directly proportional to the gestation period of a child to be self reliant. Male lions, or male tigers, even male cats do not participate in child rearing. Rather, they try to harm the kittens.
Male homo sapien sapiens , and males of some primates actively participate in child rearing. So, their offspring take longer to mature.
Mother Nature, concerned in perpetuating species on the face of the planet, inject love into brains of male primates including men so that he do not discard the female of the species just after conception and takes part in child rearing.

2007-01-13 20:06:01 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

animals have evolved in that way as we have no worries about being killed or eaten by our own parents at the age of 3 months. so basically it takes a while according to evolution as animals need to learn fast or be left wit out food

2007-01-13 20:03:37 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers