Lets look at a few thing and then try thinking logical. first of all i if you look at the fact that the explosive charge starts just behind the nose cone, and the detonator is housed in the nose come along with the targeting and flight computer(assuming we are talking about a guided missile) how is there an explosion with out the missile detonating? then you have to look at the size of the "missile" and the size of the "explosion". the missile looks huge, the "explosion" looks small compared to the "missile". now you may be asking why i have been using quotation marks around explosion. simple, that was not an explosion, it was rapid combustion. what is the difference, fuel combusts, gun powder explodes. If it had been an explosion, the concussive force would have ripped out a lot more of the building like about 20 floors instantly.
2007-01-17 12:17:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by Patrick M 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't know but it looks like a conspiracy anyway. ha ha
I really believe the other video proving that the buildings imploded with detinators on the inside of the WTCs in both buildings with explosives, that is why it imploded.They needed to fly exactly where they did to set off those charges. Gasoline alone wouldnt have done that type of damage and the buildings would have blown up all around them as well. The fires were contained from within. And no steel gurders would have collapsed either with just the Jet fuel exploding outward. So I agree obviously a conspiracy inside and out but who besides those terrorists set those charges? Public Access to all those offices is accepted with an appointment. Check on who was sick that day and who had any connection to those Arab terrorists in business or otherwise that is where to start. Or check who ordered any work done in the building? Check the rosters on inside traffic? The whys cant be found without research so thanks for the tip and the further research and your opinion.
2007-01-13 19:11:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
The 9/11 “fact” circulation is a community of human beings residing on shoddy reporting, undesirable information, embarrassingly terrible technology, and outright lies. they believe in each and every conspiracy idea from section 51 to the JFK assassination. they even believe the activities of 9/11 are appropriate in a unmarried grand, all encompassing conspiracy which changed into orchestrated with information from the Bush administration or Israel or Larry Silverstein or the “Illuminati” as component to their secret plan to rule the international. Take your decision. they imagine they’re spectacular, yet educate no skill for logical questioning by any skill. They not often cutting-edge, talk, or evaluate different factors of view, when you consider that the different attitude is basically evil.
2016-12-02 06:05:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
A large jumbo jet, almost fully laden with jet fuel, crashing into a building at over 300 mph is probably enough to cause it to go down. It didn't need a missile, a bomb, or anything else.
2007-01-14 05:52:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by Bob 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
watch the videos of the implosion! If you look closely and study them you can see small demolition charges going off as the buildings fall. This happens on all three of the buildings that collapsed that day.
2007-01-13 17:59:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Stop being a total conspiracy nut. there was no missile.
2007-01-13 18:04:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by Tumbling Dice 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
What makes you so certain? Are you an expert on missiles hitting buildings, or just another paranoid doofus?
2007-01-13 18:04:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by Mr Smart 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Just more loony conspiracy nuts.
2007-01-13 18:06:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by Jolly1 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
This video was obviously doctored. So, why the complete denial...
2007-01-13 19:00:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by WillyC 5
·
1⤊
1⤋