2007-01-13 17:09:07 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
No question, the poor due to sheer numbers. All that would needed to be reached is a breaking point, a sort of critical mass which initiates the process of a revolution of the social classes.
2007-01-13 17:13:20 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well, there are more, many more, poor. But the weapons are all on the side of the rich (see recent discussions about the military industrial complex.)
Actually, since I am working-class poor, I have to say that I think the rich are already in a war against us. They use our children for cannon fodder in their wars. They send our jobs to China (that once-dreaded Communist, non-human-rights having country...). They squeeze us for every drop of money we make. (No "loop-holes" for us).ETC. Etc. etc.
EDIT: Bet you will be surprised by this answer from this Super Liberal--I think that they "bribe" us every few years by letting us think we have elected a Democrat! (And that this Dem. is somehow different...)
2007-01-13 17:23:28 · answer #2 · answered by Joey's Back 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
For the most part I would say the poor people, given that they know how to deal with life's struggles, unlike the rich, which is being served on a silver platter.
BUT, keep in mind they will pay poor people also to be on their side and fight their war! Money is the root to all evil.
I'll bet anyone two cents to disclaim my answer.
2007-01-13 17:18:52 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The poor can whine, but the rich make boom. If every poor man stood up against the rich, the world would be a fairer place.
2007-01-13 17:16:07 · answer #4 · answered by Fadi 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The rich would buy out the poor and stop the uprising without a single casualty. Then the poor would spend all the money on stupid stuff tha tthe rich sell to them and the rich would have all the money back again.
Simple.
2007-01-13 17:12:36 · answer #5 · answered by Cattlemanbob 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
If the poor rose up against the prosperous, neither could win. the government could today step in and attempt to repair family members tranquility. In a fashion, i think which potential the prosperous could win.
2016-10-19 23:08:06 · answer #6 · answered by reus 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The poor would win (?). There are way more of them than there are of the rich.
2007-01-13 17:17:26 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think the rich would to be honest. Not being rich If I thought I could take some rich bast*rds with me when the police and military come to take me down,it might be worth it!! I volunteer to take the remaining Enron executives!! I'm surprised none of the former employees didn't try to do it themselves!!
2007-01-13 18:40:11 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
poor because it would be a much bigger army they could over power them it would be like 100 poor peopl for each rich person and rich people only have so many bulletts but there will allways be more poor people
2007-01-13 17:12:25 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
The rich would win.
Oprah would eat the poor.
2007-01-13 17:12:21 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋