Been here two days. Read many GOP myths and BS about Clinton, Carter, etc. Nothing that would explain Bush's incompetence and lies.
What makes an otherwise intelligent person support a disaster like Bushie?
Especially with no evidence, other than confirmed right wing liars like O'Rielly and Limbaugh to Back their silly little claims that make no logical sense.
2007-01-13 17:08:21 · 11 answers · asked by Jimbo 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Just read Bush's own quotes, combine them the fact on Iraq. They prove he lied. It's very simple if you're not brainwashed.
2007-01-14 02:35:18 · update #1
the only people left in his camp are clearly those that couldn't tell BS from a fact if their life depended on it... which, according to polls, is apparently about 30 percent of America...
But if you only watch Fox News... and believe that everything else is lies... you're in your own little fantasy world where everything makes sense... and that one source completely controls what you view as reality...
without Fox, Bush would be at around 15 percent...
geez, he's already apologized twice for huge mess-ups... once for Katrina and once for Iraq during his speech the other night... you don't apologize for something you didn't do...
2007-01-13 17:21:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
particularly: a million) well being care well being care costs are uncontrolled and the prevalent of well being care in this u . s . has been spirally downward for 2 many years. problem-free well being care is the norm between industrialized international locations. bobbing up a equipment of problem-free well being care is a step in direction of correcting this. the main significant factors are beside the point!!! Doing some thing (even a bad some thing) is greater advantageous than doing not something simply by fact a million) it addresses the priority and a couple of) it provides us a commencing element to strengthen on. Doing not something does neither. 2) financial equipment the financial coverage is merely approximately impossible to take care of without addressing the activities that placed our financial equipment here interior the 1st place. not the least of that are tax cuts that we could not arise with the money for, a conflict we could not arise with the money for, and company oversight which we did not have (such simply by fact the firms in contact in well being care). those ARE the themes. To maximum appropriate them you will desire to...properly...maximum appropriate THEM!!! i think of you will desire to give up attempting to distance our issues from our political leaders (Democrat AND Republican). in element of certainty nonetheless that 10 years in the past we had an absolute budgetary surplus and the possibility to accomplish a little lasting sturdy. particularly than using this surplus to a minimum of a few thing clever like Medicaid or Infrastructure progression or perhaps protection rigidity progression. WE gave it returned to the yankee human beings interior this variety of $4 hundred rebate exams. a quick term shot interior the arm for the financial equipment and a wasted danger for a rustic that (because it seems) exchange into on the element of conflict, financial fall down, and infrastructure breakdown (the only greatest blackout interior the historic previous of mankind). Face it Bush sucked, and that's impossible to not point out him while speaking approximately Obama simply by fact Bush left the country ALOT worse than he chanced on it. Whomever took place of work after him could have had to handle the Wars and the financial equipment the two considered one of that have been issues Bush created (the wars)or controlled to ignore approximately (well being care and the financial equipment).
2016-10-19 23:06:43 · answer #2 · answered by mctaggart 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I see your lack of responders answers your question. There is no defense for Bush. Those that do, cite that he is tough on terror and goes after the terrorists there instead of fighting them here. They neglect to mention that he attacked Iraq after 9-11 and Iraq had zero to do with 9-11. They tell you he is a straight talker and means what he says. Yet they leave off hundreds of links of Bush talking and saying things that no one is quite certain of the meaning. They will tell you he has a great plan with his "surge" but neglect to mention that the only reason more, if any troops are needed is to protect the oil fields for American oil investors. Not to mention that the surge is also a precursor to war with Iran. They will tell you that the economy is great because the DOW is setting records. They neglect to tell you that the DOW represents only 30 stocks and that only 20% of Americans own 80% of the stock. They also neglect to tell you that personal savings in America is at an all time low and personal debt is at an all time high.
There is no defending him. O'Rielly and Limbaugh supply lies to the "base" , but provide no substance and certainly no truth.
2007-01-13 17:29:14 · answer #3 · answered by truth seeker 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Can you make arguments with real facts? What lies did Bush tell? Are you referring to the information that he received from credible sources about WMDs in Iraq and the fact that this info came from other countries as well and democrats also believed it. Or are you a conspiracy nut and think that he lied about 9/11. Do you back up your incompetence claims by overlooking the fact he went to Yale and was elected president twice?
2007-01-13 17:16:42 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Keep this in mind, there is so much in this world that we, as Americans, cannot handle the truth on. There are so many secrets that must be kept from us to ensure victory. I would take a God fearing president versus one that worked for the devil himself.
2007-01-13 17:24:21 · answer #5 · answered by Silver B 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Because Libs define "facts" like Clinton defines "sexual relations"
2007-01-13 18:24:06 · answer #6 · answered by Gunny T 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
You claim that others have no evidence to support their statements but it is your writings that are not backed up by any facts. Why is that?
.
2007-01-14 01:24:06 · answer #7 · answered by Terence C 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Bush has been diagnosed by one medical doctor as a sociopath.
Source: http://www.buzzflash.com/articles/interviews/049
Fox News is slanted to favor the Republican Party so you can stick that theory about Hannity.com
2007-01-13 17:17:30 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
well jimbo things are looking arnt looking to good for him or the USA are they,my big worry is that we have lost to many soldiers and are broke for an unjust war.though his own, party is sick of his bad dissions,
2007-01-13 17:23:45 · answer #9 · answered by gscott43206 2 · 1⤊ 4⤋
See if your BS stands up to Sean Hannity's arguments.....
2007-01-13 17:16:58 · answer #10 · answered by Chief Paduke 5 · 2⤊ 5⤋