English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-01-13 16:22:06 · 19 answers · asked by COD 3 in Entertainment & Music Music

19 answers

Nirvana for the smple fact that they were the leaders of the grundge era and because there music is so deep and involved unlike Elvis who sang songs about women 99 percent of the time. Thats not talent anyone can right a song about a lost love or a girl, and if you look at music today 99% of bands out there get there start with one of those songs. Don't get me wrong Elvis was a great performer and all but he doesn't match up to Cobain, Novoselic, and Grohl.

2007-01-13 16:34:06 · answer #1 · answered by Satan 4 · 0 2

Nirvana

2007-01-14 00:30:08 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I prefer Nirvana over Elvis.

2007-01-14 00:25:55 · answer #3 · answered by blueeyeskenai 4 · 0 0

Elvis

2007-01-14 00:26:42 · answer #4 · answered by Chloe 4 · 0 0

Elvis

2007-01-14 00:25:18 · answer #5 · answered by JACQUELINE T 6 · 0 0

Nirvana!

2007-01-14 00:25:42 · answer #6 · answered by tike16 2 · 0 0

Which is better? Ice cream or blue? They are completely different. But, Elvis hit #1 again in 2002, twenty five years after his death. So, Elvis.

2007-01-14 00:49:19 · answer #7 · answered by Mangy Coyote 5 · 0 0

Elvis-he probably made more money annualy dead than Nirvana did in the same years when they were alive/all together.

2007-01-14 00:25:39 · answer #8 · answered by Gadwall 3 · 0 0

Thats a strange comparison, or should I say no comparison, Elvis all the way, he was the inspiration for alot of music talents.

2007-01-14 00:34:25 · answer #9 · answered by n2tapas 3 · 0 0

Nirvana all the way

2007-01-14 00:24:38 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers