i do
2007-01-13 15:39:06 · 18 answers · asked by Nunya B 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
ahaha i forgot to take world out not its usa world. i cant edit it soo i put it here
2007-01-13 16:00:19 · update #1
I don't have to think to answer this question. It is obvious. The entire planet would be better off if GWB was never born. His dad too and his grandpa. All of them are murderers.
2007-01-13 15:48:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
Are you another Bush basher? Are you an American? If so, it's the "United States of America". We voted for President Bush. He won "fair and square". He's our leader, our President, honest, loyal, fighting for you and me. How about we all get behind him and cheer him and the troops on to victory! A question like this goes nowhere. Did you think it would help?
2007-01-14 01:39:27 · answer #2 · answered by lindakflowers 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
USA World?? You are talking as if the USA were the world's biggest hegemonist. It's THE world, not the USA world.
Yes, it would be better off without Bush being president. He destablized Iraq and maybe the rest of the world as well by invading it, and now he wants to throw more good troops after a bad cause.
2007-01-13 23:47:21 · answer #3 · answered by alnitaka 4 · 1⤊ 4⤋
I think USA would be better without Bush and also without THIS secret and evil world that's been in control of everything for far too long!...
http://www.rense.com/general58/suspre.htm
2007-01-16 12:20:28 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
This can go both ways. Yes we could be better off without him as President, but we could also be doing a lot worse. Just when you think you have hit bottom, the bottom breaks from under you.
2007-01-13 23:45:02 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I'm pretty sure almost anybody would be doing a better job than Bush. He is sending MORE troops to Iraq when most of the country wants them all HOME. I doesn't tell his own country the truth half the time, and he's made the rest of the world hate the U.S.
2007-01-14 00:21:15 · answer #6 · answered by Christina 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
No were much better off without the media that's who we need to get rid of.
2007-01-14 04:57:40 · answer #7 · answered by josh m 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You can't possibly answer this. Nobody knows what COULD have happened had he not been the one elected. You can't say that someone else could have done better/worse because we simply don't know everything.
2007-01-13 23:47:16 · answer #8 · answered by eccentricmommy 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
George W. Bush is a good president. We would be probably worse wiith Kerry as president, i mean that guy (Kerry) is an IDIOT
2007-01-14 00:02:52 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
I do not know if it would be better but it would be respected for its morality and not known as a bully on the block with no morals and known for deceit
2007-01-13 23:44:06 · answer #10 · answered by billc4u 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋