2007-01-13 15:15:49 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Wrestling
Although it might get more viewership
It would WWE lost opportunities to make money
But other than that, YEAH i think wrestlemania should be free
2007-01-17 13:15:00 · answer #1 · answered by OneLove 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Na if anything it should be more wrestlemanias bigger than every other pay per veiw but at lest saturday nights main events is free
2007-01-13 15:27:10 · answer #2 · answered by Hardyzthuganomics 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Vince charges way too much for PPV's so I never get them. I do however dish out the $7.95 a month for WWE on demand and I recommend it highly. I love watching Bret Hart and others.
2007-01-16 15:32:40 · answer #3 · answered by flyington 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it should but wwe would be at lost of lots of money because wrestlemania easly does 1,000,000 buys around the world
2007-01-13 15:20:05 · answer #4 · answered by KeNnEdY a.K.a. Styles clash 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
never happen... it's their big moneymaker and #1 PPV event.
Now what they should do if they insist on having all these other PPVs outside of the other moderately big ones (Royal Rumble, SummerSlam) they can drop the price on some of those (or better yet, get rid of them entirely).
2007-01-13 15:23:37 · answer #5 · answered by Cruel Angel 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am all for it as long as its commercial free, nothing irritates me more than watching raw and smackdown and having the matches interrupted by commercials.
2007-01-13 15:28:59 · answer #6 · answered by Wes B 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i dont kno
2007-01-14 02:06:15 · answer #7 · answered by Jordannnn 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋