be with somebody, but be miserable, or be alone and lonely?
2007-01-13 15:12:12 · 17 answers · asked by Gorgeous 5 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
I have been both, alone and lonely, is better than being with someone and being miserable, because usually when you are miserable you are lonely, anyway.
2007-01-13 15:21:40 · answer #1 · answered by ball_courtney 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Odds are that if you are with someone and are miserable you'll be lonely anyway. So I'll take alone and lonely. There's potential in that!
2007-01-13 23:26:08 · answer #2 · answered by Gabby 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
definitely be alone and lonely. being miserable sucks you always gotta worry about what that woman is gonna put you through the very next day.
2007-01-13 23:17:07 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Honestly, I rather be alone and lonely because the peace is welcome, I have my friends and family, and I would use the time to grow and expand myself as a person. I wouldn't settle for less and be someone who I don't want to be with, life is to short.
2007-01-13 23:19:09 · answer #4 · answered by ♥♥Bree♥♥ 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
those are pretty much the same thing because if your miserable with someone wont you be feeling lonely
2007-01-13 23:16:21 · answer #5 · answered by ♫That'll be the Day♫ 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Be alone, I wouldn't be lonely. I'd appreciate the peace.
2007-01-13 23:14:44 · answer #6 · answered by Baby'sMom 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Alone.
2007-01-13 23:19:59 · answer #7 · answered by ≤Daлiel≥ 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
alone & lonely
2007-01-13 23:19:42 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Alone and happy
2007-01-13 23:15:43 · answer #9 · answered by ... 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you can be alone and not be lonely and i choose that
2007-01-13 23:15:40 · answer #10 · answered by Tek ~aka~Legs! 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋