hold up! if Jerry Springer were president, I'd be on the other side of the world.
2007-01-13 14:49:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by Ang 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
human beings do no longer want Jerry Springers call dragged with the aid of the dirt and in comparison to Sarah Palin Jerry never end his elected submit via fact he become picked on BTW bill Clinton adventure----ruled a state with 2,800,000+ Jimmy Carter adventure---ruled a state with 9,685,744 Sarah the whiner----ruled a state with 686,293 and end !!!!!! Gov. Sarah Palin's signature accomplishment — a settlement to construct a a million,715-mile pipeline to deliver organic gas from Alaska to the decrease 40 8 — emerged from a improper bidding technique that narrowed the sphere to a employer with ties to her administration, an linked Press examine shows. commencing up on the Republican national convention in August, the McCain-Palin fee ticket has touted the pipeline as an occasion of ways it may help united statesa. gain skill independence. in spite of Palin's boast of a clever and uncomplicated bidding technique, the AP stumbled on that her group crafted words that favorite in basic terms some autonomous pipeline companies and finally benefited the winner, TransCanada Corp. And opposite to the ballyhoo, there is not any assure the pipeline will ever be equipped; at a minimum, any undertaking is years away, as TransCanada ought to first triumph over significant financial and regulatory hurdles.
2016-12-12 10:53:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
He was on Dancing with the stars. You would know if you had watched he is a very dedicated and loving person especially where his family is concerned. He is nothing like his show. He is a very normal person with high standards. He just does his job on his show and then goes back to his normal life style.
His policies as a president would be totally moral ones not unethical ones.
2007-01-13 14:56:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by Samantha 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
He would be a liberal, I think he would be alot like carter.
Dont' let his talk show fool you, he was and is to some extent a politician.
Most of his views fall in line with democratic party. He's a good guy who did a bad show.
His policies would be
more social programs, better education, and less war.
2007-01-13 14:50:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by nefariousx 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Just like his show. Entertaining, but of very little social value.
2007-01-13 14:58:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mr. US of A, Baby! 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Mindless and entertaining, but not helpful to anybody but himself. Kinda like Dubya really...
2007-01-13 14:48:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
He'd have people f****** in the streets.
He'd have them cursing and fighting also.
Then he would book them all and laugh all the way to the bank.
LOL....Poor Suckers....LOL!!
2007-01-13 14:51:14
·
answer #7
·
answered by Sailon 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Don't take any crap from your boyfriend who is sleeping with your brother.
It would be a step up from who we have now.
2007-01-13 14:49:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by l'il mama 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Whatever it takes to get higher ratings.
2007-01-13 14:48:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
a trailer park in every neighborhood
2007-01-13 14:47:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by Dfirefox 6
·
2⤊
0⤋